Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Superintending Engineer Vs. the Secretary, Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission,

The Superintending Engineer vs The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 02, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/927314

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition No.1865 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 to 7 of 2010
Subject
Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution

Key legal issue
Constitution
Acts & sections
Constitution of India - Articles 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Superintending Engineer

Advocate Mr.Rameshwar, Adv.

Respondent

The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission,

Advocate Mr.N.C.Rajah, Adv

Legal References

Acts
Constitution of India - Articles 226

Excerpt

this writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the relevant records of the first respondent's impugned notice in tneo/f.e. tax/petitions/d.no.1656/2009, dated 1.12.2009 and to quash the same as illegal and without authority of law and jurisdiction and to direct the first respondent to pass orders on the appeals in tneo.p.nos.47 to52 of 2009, filed by the petitioner pending before it, in accordance with law, without insisting upon the government of tamil nadu as one of the parties, in the appeal proceedings.order1. this writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the impugned notice, dated 1.12.2009, issued by the first respondent and to direct the first respondent to pass orders on the appeals filed by the petitioner in accordance with law, without insisting upon the government of tamil nadu to be impleaded as one of the parties in the appeal proceedings.2. it is seen that by the notice, impugned herein, the first respondent-electricity ombudsman has directed the consumers/applicants to implead the government of tamil nadu (energy) department, as party respondent in this case. in that claim, the superintending engineer is already a party. moreover, in the grounds raised in the writ petition, the superintending engineer plea is that the government of tamil nadu (energy) department cannot be made as a party. as and when the individuals/respondents herein take out an application and on notice, it is for the government (energy) department to raise the plea that they are not necessary parties. it is not for the superintending engineer, to plead the case on behalf of the government. thus, the writ petition filed by the petitioner-superintending engineer, without authorisation by the government of tamil nadu (energy) department is not maintainable. hence, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. no costs. consequently, connected

Full Judgment

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the relevant records of the first respondent's impugned notice in TNEO/F.E. Tax/Petitions/D.No.1656/2009, dated 1.12.2009 and to quash the same as illegal and without authority of law and jurisdiction and to direct the first respondent to pass orders on the Appeals in TNEO.P.Nos.47 to52 of 2009, filed by the petitioner pending before it, in accordance with law, without insisting upon the Government of Tamil Nadu as one of the parties, in the Appeal proceedings.

ORDER

1. This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned notice, dated 1.12.2009, issued by the first respondent and to direct the first respondent to pass orders on the Appeals filed by the petitioner in accordance with law, without insisting upon the Government of Tamil Nadu to be impleaded as one of the parties in the Appeal proceedings.

2. It is seen that by the notice, impugned herein, the first respondent-Electricity Ombudsman has directed the consumers/applicants to implead the Government of Tamil Nadu (Energy) Department, as party respondent in this case. In that claim, the Superintending Engineer is already a party. Moreover, in the grounds raised in the Writ Petition, the Superintending Engineer plea is that the Government of Tamil Nadu (Energy) Department cannot be made as a party. As and when the individuals/respondents herein take out an application and on notice, it is for the Government (Energy) Department to raise the plea that they are not necessary parties. It is not for the Superintending Engineer, to plead the case on behalf of the Government. Thus, the Writ Petition filed by the petitioner-Superintending Engineer, without authorisation by the Government of Tamil Nadu (Energy) Department is not maintainable. Hence, the Writ Petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial