S.Subbiah, Vs. the Licensing Authority and District Collecotr.

S.Subbiah, vs The Licensing Authority and District Collecotr.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 04, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/927237

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/927237
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: R.Sudhakar, J.
Decided On: Apr 04, 2012
Case Number: Writ Petition No.9345 of 2012
Subject: Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[ R.SUDHAKAR, J.] - Constitution Of India - Article 226 -- Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to implement the suspension of "C" Form license against the petitioner theatre on some other 3 days instead of 06.04.2012, 07.04.2012 and 08.04.2012. Learned counsel for the...

Key legal issue: Constitution
Acts & sections: Constitution Of India - Article 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Subbiah,

Advocate Mr.N.Sathyamoorthi, Adv.

Respondent

The Licensing Authority and District Collecotr.

Advocate Ms.V.M.Velumani, Adv.

Legal References

Acts: Constitution Of India - Article 226

Excerpt

[ r.sudhakar, j.] - constitution of india - article 226 -- writ petition is filed praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to implement the suspension of "c" form license against the petitioner theatre on some other 3 days instead of 06.04.2012, 07.04.2012 and 08.04.2012. learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has given a representation dated 3.4.2012. writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to implement the suspension of "c" form license against the petitioner theatre on some other 3 days instead of 06.04.2012, 07.04.2012 and 08.04.2012.r.sudhakar, j.order1. writ petition is filed praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to implement the suspension of "c" form license against the petitioner theatre on some other 3 days instead of 06.04.2012, 07.04.2012 and 08.04.2012.2. ms.v.m.velumani, learned special government pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondent. by consent the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has given a representation dated 3.4.2012. he requests this court to direct the respondent to consider the said representation expeditiously. 4. considering the relief now sought for, without going into the merits of the case, the respondent district collector is directed to consider the representation dated 3.12.2012 on its own merits and in accordance with law forthwith.5. the writ petition is disposed of as above. no costs.

Full Judgment

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to implement the suspension of "C" Form license against the petitioner theatre on some other 3 days instead of 06.04.2012, 07.04.2012 and 08.04.2012.

R.SUDHAKAR, J.

ORDER

1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to implement the suspension of "C" Form license against the petitioner theatre on some other 3 days instead of 06.04.2012, 07.04.2012 and 08.04.2012.

2. Ms.V.M.Velumani, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has given a representation dated 3.4.2012. He requests this court to direct the respondent to consider the said representation expeditiously.

4. Considering the relief now sought for, without going into the merits of the case, the respondent District Collector is directed to consider the representation dated 3.12.2012 on its own merits and in accordance with law forthwith.

5. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2012 Same Parties S.Subbiah, vs The Licensing Authority and District Collecotr. Same Subject Constitution Same Judge R.Sudhakar, J. Acts & Sections Constitution Of India - Article 226

Constitution