Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nalini. Vs. the Assistant Engineer

Nalini. vs The Assistant Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 27, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/926907

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition Nos.12448 and 12449 of 2012
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[R.SUDHAKAR, J.] Constitution of India - Articles 226 -- Both Writ Petitions are filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to give electricity service connection to the petitioners' house situate in SF No.40/1 bearing Door No.5/26, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Egattur Village, Chengalpet Taluk.

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Constitution of India - Articles 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nalini.

Advocate Mr.Su.Srinivasan, Adv.

Respondent

The Assistant Engineer

Advocate Mr.G.Vasudevan, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Constitution of India - Articles 226

Excerpt

[r.sudhakar, j.] constitution of india - articles 226 -- both writ petitions are filed praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to give electricity service connection to the petitioners' house situate in sf no.40/1 bearing door no.5/26, old mahabalipuram road, egattur village, chengalpet taluk.both writ petitions are filed under article 226 of constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to give electricity service connection to the petitioners' house situate in sf no.40/1 bearing door no.5/26, old mahabalipuram road, egattur village, chengalpet taluk.common order1. both writ petitions are filed praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to give electricity service connection to the petitioners' house situate in sf no.40/1 bearing door no.5/26, old mahabalipuram road, egattur village, chengalpet taluk.2. mr.g.vasudevan, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent. the prayer in both the writ petitions is one and the same. by consent, both writ petitions are taken up together for final order.3. two petitioners seek electricity service connection for residential house. they gave separate representation to the respondent. no application in accordance with the provisions of the tamil nadu electricity distribution code has been filed.4. learned additional government pleader states that if proper application is furnished, the respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law.5. in view of the relief sought for and also the submission made by the learned government advocate, the petitioners are directed to submit proper application to the respondent along with a copy of this order. as and when appropriate application is made, the respondent shall consider the same and decide the issue in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter.6. both the writ petitions are disposed of as above. no costs.

Full Judgment

Both Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to give electricity service connection to the petitioners' house situate in SF No.40/1 bearing Door No.5/26, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Egattur Village, Chengalpet Taluk.

COMMON ORDER

1. Both Writ Petitions are filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to give electricity service connection to the petitioners' house situate in SF No.40/1 bearing Door No.5/26, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Egattur Village, Chengalpet Taluk.

2. Mr.G.Vasudevan, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent. The prayer in both the writ petitions is one and the same. By consent, both writ petitions are taken up together for final order.

3. Two petitioners seek electricity service connection for residential house. They gave separate representation to the respondent. No application in accordance with the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code has been filed.

4. Learned Additional Government Pleader states that if proper application is furnished, the respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law.

5. In view of the relief sought for and also the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, the petitioners are directed to submit proper application to the respondent along with a copy of this order. As and when appropriate application is made, the respondent shall consider the same and decide the issue in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter.

6. Both the Writ Petitions are disposed of as above. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial