Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Union of India Vs. Sampat

Union of India vs Sampat

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Jul 09, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/926798

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Civil Appeal No. 5085 of 2012 At Special Leave Petition (C) No.21341 of 2004
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent

Sampat

Excerpt

order1. leave granted.2. delay condoned.3. we have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.4. both sides would agree that the issues raised and the relief sought for in this appeal are identical with the issues raised and considered by this court in the case of union of india vs. giani in civil appeal no.1884/2011 on february 17, 2011.5. in view of the above, this appeal is also disposed of, in the same terms, observations and directions contained in the aforesaid order.ordered accordingly......................j. (h.l. dattu).....................j. (chandramauli kr. prasad)new delhi;july 09, 2012item no.48 court no.8 section xivrecord of proceedings petition(s) for special leave to appeal (civil) no(s).21341/2004(from the judgment and order dated 31/05/2002 in rfa no.466/1986 of the high court of delhi at n. delhi)union of india vs sampat (with prayer for interim relief and office report )date: 09/07/2012this petition was called on for hearing today.coram :hon'ble mr. justice h.l. dattuhon'ble mr. justice chandramauli kr. prasadfor petitioner(s)mr. j. s. attri, sr. adv.mrs. rekha pandey, adv.for mrs anil katiyar, adv.for respondent(s)mr. k. l. janjani, adv.mr.pankaj kumar singh, adv.for mr. raj singh rana,adv.upon hearing counsel the court made the followingorderleave granted.delay condoned.we have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.appeal disposed of, in terms of the signed order.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. Delay condoned.

3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.

4. Both sides would agree that the issues raised and the relief sought for in this appeal are identical with the issues raised and considered by this Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Giani in Civil Appeal No.1884/2011 on February 17, 2011.

5. In view of the above, this appeal is also disposed of, in the same terms, observations and directions contained in the aforesaid order.

Ordered accordingly......................J. (H.L. DATTU).....................J. (CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD)

NEW DELHI;

JULY 09, 2012

ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.8 SECTION XIV

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).21341/2004

(From the judgment and order dated 31/05/2002 in RFA No.466/1986 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)

Union of India Vs Sampat (With prayer for interim relief and office report )

Date: 09/07/2012

This Petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv.

Mrs. Rekha Pandey, Adv.

for Mrs Anil Katiyar, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. K. L. Janjani, Adv.

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv.

For Mr. Raj Singh Rana,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

ORDER

Leave granted.

Delay condoned.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.

Appeal disposed of, in terms of the signed order.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial