P.Venkatesan Vs. the Managing Director.

P.Venkatesan. vs The Managing Director.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 08, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/926076

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/926076
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: M.Jaichandren, J.
Decided On: Mar 08, 2012
Case Number: Writ Petition No.2098 of 2012 and Miscellaneous Petition No.1 of 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Venkatesan.

Advocate Mr.P.Pandiyaraj, Adv.

Respondent

The Managing Director.

Advocate Mr.S.Muthuraj, Adv.

Excerpt

writ petition filed under article 226 of constitution of india praying for issuance of writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents herein their men, agents, servants, subordinates or any other person or persons claiming through them or authorized by them from in any manner, shifting the imfl shop no.661 of chennai south region and the bar attached therewith from the premises bearing door no.2 and 1a respectively of venkatraman salai, choolai pallam, mgr nagar, chennai 600 078 to any other location.order1. this writ petition has been filed praying that this court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents herein, their men, subordinates and other persons claiming through them from, in any manner, shifting the indian made foreign liquor, shop no.661, of chennai south region, and the bar attached therewith, from the premises bearing door no.2 and 1a of venkatraman salai, choolai pallam, mgr nagar, chennai.2.at this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents had submitted, on instructions, that there is no proposal to shift the indian made foreign liquor shop, bearing shop no.661 and the bar attached to the said shop, at present.3.in view of the said submission being made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, since, no further orders are necessary, the writ petition stands closed. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Full Judgment

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents herein their men, agents, servants, subordinates or any other person or persons claiming through them or authorized by them from in any manner, shifting the IMFL Shop No.661 of Chennai South Region and the Bar attached therewith from the premises bearing Door No.2 and 1A respectively of Venkatraman Salai, Choolai Pallam, MGR Nagar, Chennai 600 078 to any other location.

ORDER

1. This writ petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents herein, their men, subordinates and other persons claiming through them from, in any manner, shifting the Indian Made Foreign Liquor, Shop No.661, of Chennai South Region, and the Bar attached therewith, from the premises bearing Door No.2 and 1A of Venkatraman Salai, Choolai Pallam, MGR Nagar, Chennai.

2.At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents had submitted, on instructions, that there is no proposal to shift the Indian Made Foreign Liquor shop, bearing shop No.661 and the bar attached to the said shop, at present.

3.In view of the said submission being made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, since, no further orders are necessary, the writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2012 Same Parties P.Venkatesan. vs The Managing Director. Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge M.Jaichandren, J.