Yanose Vs. the Director and ors.

Yanose vs The Director and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 25, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/925784

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/925784
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: D.Hariparanthaman, J.
Decided On: Apr 25, 2012
Case Number: Writ Petition (MD) No.4961 of 2011
Subject: Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution

Key legal issue: Constitution
Acts & sections: Tamil Nadu Government Servant's Conduct Rules - Rule 22; Constitution of India - Article 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Yanose

Advocate Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar, Adv.

Respondent

The Director and ors.

Legal References

Acts: Tamil Nadu Government Servant's Conduct Rules - Rule 22; Constitution of India - Article 226

Excerpt

prayerpetition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the 1st and 3rd respondents to initiate appropriate action against the 5th respondent and may impose maximum punishment to the 5th respondent for violating rule 22 of tamil nadu government servant's conducting rules.order1. the writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 3 to initiate appropriate action against the 5th respondent and to impose maximum punishment for violation of rule 22 of the tamil nadu government servant's conduct rules.2. according to the petitioner, the 5th respondent is employed as pharmacist in the kanyakumari government medical college hospital and participated in some agitation, for which, he was imposed only warning as punishment. hence, the writ petition is filed seeking for appropriate action to impose maximum punishment.3. in my view, it is for the authorities concerned to decide as to what should be the punishment that could be imposed on its employee. this court could not interfere in the domain of the respondents 1 to 4 relating to disciplinary matter. even according to the petitioner, some punishment was imposed and some order was passed. hence, i am of the view, the writ petition deserves to be dismissed. accordingly, the same is dismissed. no costs.

Full Judgment

Prayer

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st and 3rd respondents to initiate appropriate action against the 5th respondent and may impose maximum punishment to the 5th respondent for violating Rule 22 of Tamil Nadu Government Servant's conducting Rules.

ORDER

1. The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 3 to initiate appropriate action against the 5th respondent and to impose maximum punishment for violation of Rule 22 of the Tamil Nadu Government Servant's Conduct Rules.

2. According to the petitioner, the 5th respondent is employed as Pharmacist in the Kanyakumari Government Medical College Hospital and participated in some agitation, for which, he was imposed only warning as punishment. Hence, the writ petition is filed seeking for appropriate action to impose maximum punishment.

3. In my view, it is for the authorities concerned to decide as to what should be the punishment that could be imposed on its employee. This Court could not interfere in the domain of the respondents 1 to 4 relating to disciplinary matter. Even according to the petitioner, some punishment was imposed and some order was passed. Hence, I am of the view, the writ petition deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2012 Same Parties Yanose vs The Director and ors. Same Subject Constitution Same Judge D.Hariparanthaman, J. Acts & Sections Tamil Nadu Government Servant's Conduct Rules - Rule 22; Cons...