Anil Kumar R and ors. Vs. the State of KarnatakA.

Anil Kumar R and ors. vs The State of KarnatakA.

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Feb 28, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/925587

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/925587
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: Subhash B Adi, J.
Decided On: Feb 28, 2012
Case Number: CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1130 OF 2012 CW CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1142 OF 2012
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[SUBHASH B ADI, J.] CRL.P filed U/S.439 CR.P.C fraying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in CR.NO.90/12 of Rajagopalnagara P.3., Bangalore, for the offences P/U/S 399, 402 of IPC.

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 - Sections 399, 402; Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Section 439

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil Kumar R and ors.

Advocate SRI HARISH KUMAR M C; SAI LAW ASSOCIATES. ADVS

Respondent

The State of KarnatakA.

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 - Sections 399, 402; Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Section 439

Excerpt

[subhash b adi, j.] crl.p filed u/s.439 cr.p.c fraying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in cr.no.90/12 of rajagopalnagara p.3., bangalore, for the offences p/u/s 399, 402 of ipc.1. petitioners in these petitions are accused nos. 1,2 and 3. case has been registered against them in crime no.90/ 2012 by rajagopalanagara police, bangalore city, for the offences punishable under sections 399, 402 of ipc.2. these accused have been apprehended on suspicion that they had made a preparation to commit dacoity.3. learned high court government pleader submits that there is only one case registered against these petitioners.4. having regard to the same, i find that the petitioners could be enlarged on bail subject to certain conditions.5. accordingly, these petitions are allowed. petitioners are enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions:(i) the petitioners shall execute a personal bond for rs.25,000/- each with two solvent sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial court,(ii) the petitioners shall regularly- attend the court on hearing dates.(iii) the petitioners shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

Full Judgment

1. Petitioners in these petitions are accused Nos. 1,2 and 3. Case has been registered against them in Crime No.90/ 2012 by RajagopaLanagara Police, Bangalore City, for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of IPC.

2. These accused have been apprehended on suspicion that they had made a preparation to commit dacoity.

3. Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that there is only one case registered against these petitioners.

4. Having regard to the same, I find that the petitioners could be enlarged on bail subject to certain conditions.

5. Accordingly, these petitions are allowed. Petitioners are enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioners shall execute a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two solvent sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court,

(ii) The petitioners shall regularly- attend the Court on hearing dates.

(iii) The petitioners shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2012 Same Parties Anil Kumar R and ors. vs The State of KarnatakA. Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Subhash B Adi, J. Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 - Sections 399, 402; Code Of Cri...

Criminal