Hemanth Kumar Vs. the State of KarnatakA.

Hemanth Kumar vs The State of KarnatakA.

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Mar 01, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/925432

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/925432
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: Subhash B Adi, J.
Decided On: Mar 01, 2012
Case Number: CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1215 of 2012
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[SUBHASH B ADI, J.] Indian Penal Code - Sections 395, 397 - Punishment for dacoity -- CSL.P filed u/s.439 CR.P.C praying to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in 8.0.50 220/10 on the file CP The P.O., FTC, hunsur.

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395, 397

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hemanth Kumar

Advocate SRI. L SUDHARSHAN. Adv

Respondent

The State of KarnatakA.

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395, 397

Excerpt

[subhash b adi, j.] indian penal code - sections 395, 397 - punishment for dacoity -- csl.p filed u/s.439 cr.p.c praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in 8.0.50 220/10 on the file cp the p.o., ftc, hunsur. 1. the petitioner m accused no.1. he has been charge-sheeted for the offered punishable under section. 395, 397 of ipc.2. from this accused, there m recovery of knife. similar by placed accused lfcff.3, 4 and 5 have been enlarged on bail by this court in criminal petition no.389/ 2012, dated 07.02.2012.3. having regard to the same, i find that the petitioner has be enlarged on bail subject to certain conditions.4. accordingly, the petition is allowed. petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions:(i) the petitioner shall execute a personal bond for rs .25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the hlees sum to the satisfaction of the trial court.(ii) the petitioner shall regularly attend the court on hearing dates.(iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution without.

Full Judgment

1. The petitioner m accused No.1. He has been charge-sheeted for the offered punishable under Section. 395, 397 of IPC.

2. From this accused, there m recovery of knife. Similar by placed accused lfcff.3, 4 and 5 have been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Petition No.389/ 2012, dated 07.02.2012.

3. Having regard to the same, I find that the petitioner has be enlarged on bail subject to certain conditions.

4. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for Rs .25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the Hlees sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall regularly attend the Court on hearing dates.

(iii) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution without.

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2012 Same Parties Hemanth Kumar vs The State of KarnatakA. Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Subhash B Adi, J. Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395, 397

Criminal