Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lincoln Vs. Power

Lincoln vs Power

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1916
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/92510

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
241 U.S. 651
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lincoln

Respondent

Power

Excerpt

lincoln v. power - 241 u.s. 651 (1916) u.s. supreme court lincoln v. power , 241 u.s. 651 (1916) 241 u.s. 651 ignatius timothy tribich lincoln, appellant, v. james m. power, marshal, etc. no. 793. supreme court of the united states may 1, 1916 per curiam: judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) re oteiza y cortes, 136 u.s. 330, 334 , 34 s. l. ed. 464, 466, 10 sup. ct. rep. 1031, 8 am. crim. rep. 241; ornelas v. ruiz, 161 u.s. 502, 508 , 40 s. l. ed. 787, 789, 16 sup. ct. rep. 689; page 241 u.s. 651, 652 bryant v. united states, 167 u.s. 104, 105 , 42 s. l. ed. 94, 95, 17 sup. ct. rep. 744; terlinden v. ames, 184 u.s. 270, 278 , 46 s. l. ed. 534, 541, 22 sup. ct. rep. 484, 12 am. crim. rep. 424; elias v. ramirez, 215 u.s. 398, 406 , 407 s., 54 l. ed. 253, 256, 257, 30 sup. ct. rep. 131; mcnamara v. henkel, 226 u.s. 520, 523 , 57 s. l. ed. 330, 332, 33 sup. ct. rep. 146; (2) david kaufman & sons co. v. smith, 216 u.s. 610 , 54 l. ed. 636, 30 sup. ct. rep. 419; toop v. ulysses land co. 237 u.s. 580 , 59 l. ed. 1127, 35 sup. ct. rep. 739; manila invest. co. v. trammell, 239 u.s. 31 , 60 l. ed . --, 36 sup. ct. rep. 12. mr. addison s. pratt for appellant. mr. charles fox for appellee.

Full Judgment

LINCOLN v. POWER - 241 U.S. 651 (1916)
U.S. Supreme Court LINCOLN v. POWER , 241 U.S. 651 (1916)

241 U.S. 651

IGNATIUS TIMOTHY TRIBICH LINCOLN, Appellant,
v.
JAMES M. POWER, Marshal, etc.
No. 793.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 1, 1916

Per Curiam:

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Re Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U.S. 330, 334 , 34 S. L. ed. 464, 466, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1031, 8 Am. Crim. Rep. 241; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U.S. 502, 508 , 40 S. L. ed. 787, 789, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 689;

Page 241 U.S. 651, 652

Bryant v. United States, 167 U.S. 104, 105 , 42 S. L. ed. 94, 95, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 744; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U.S. 270, 278 , 46 S. L. ed. 534, 541, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484, 12 Am. Crim. Rep. 424; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U.S. 398, 406 , 407 S., 54 L. ed. 253, 256, 257, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 131; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U.S. 520, 523 , 57 S. L. ed. 330, 332, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; (2) David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U.S. 610 , 54 L. ed. 636, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co. 237 U.S. 580 , 59 L. ed. 1127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739; Manila Invest. Co. v. Trammell, 239 U.S. 31 , 60 L. ed . --, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 12.

Mr. Addison S. Pratt for appellant.

Mr. Charles Fox for appellee.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial