Alder Vs. Edenborn

Alder vs Edenborn

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-04-1916

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/92309

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/92309
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Dec-04-1916
Case Number: 242 U.S. 137
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Alder

Respondent

Edenborn

Excerpt

alder v. edenborn - 242 u.s. 137 (1916) u.s. supreme court alder v. edenborn, 242 u.s. 137 (1916) alder v. edenborn no. 9 argued may 5, 1915 restored to docket for reargument april 3, 1916 reargued october 23, 1916 decided december 4, 1916 242 u.s. 137 certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the second circuit syllabus decided on authority of sim v. edenborn, ante, p. 242 u. s. 131 . 206 f. 275 reversed. mr. justice mc reynolds delivered the opinion of the court. this cause is similar in all essential respects to sim v. edenborn, just decided. accordingly, the circuit court of appeals' action is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. reversed. mr. justice mc kenna, mr. justice day, and mr. justice van devanter dissent.

Full Judgment

Alder v. Edenborn - 242 U.S. 137 (1916)
U.S. Supreme Court Alder v. Edenborn, 242 U.S. 137 (1916)

Alder v. Edenborn

No. 9

Argued May 5, 1915

Restored to docket for reargument April 3, 1916

Reargued October 23, 1916

Decided December 4, 1916

242 U.S. 137

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SYLLABUS

Decided on authority of Sim v. Edenborn, ante, p. 242 U. S. 131 .

206 F. 275 reversed.

MR. JUSTICE Mc REYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

This cause is similar in all essential respects to Sim v. Edenborn, just decided. Accordingly, the circuit court of appeals' action is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Reversed.

MR. JUSTICE Mc KENNA, MR. JUSTICE DAY, and MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER dissent.

Same Parties Alder vs Edenborn Same Subject Service Tax