Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Prem Prakash and ors Vs. State and anr

Prem Prakash and ors vs State and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 21, 2011
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/922620

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.M.C. 3804 of 2011
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498A, 406, 34

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prem Prakash and ors

Respondent

State and anr

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498A, 406, 34

Excerpt

1 notice issued.2 mr. navin sharma, learned app for state and mr. mohan sharma, advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent no.1/state and respondent no.2/complainant.3 learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide fir no. 490/2009, a case under section 498a/406/34 ipc was registered at p.s. jahangirpuri, delhi against the petitioners on the complaint of respondent no. 2/complainant.4 it is further submitted that the parties have amicably settled the matter and the marriage between petitioner no.1/husband and respondent no.2/wife has been dissolved amicably vide a decree of mutual consent.5 respondent no. 2 is personally present in the court. she has been duly identified by io/si anil kumar. 6 mr. mohan kumar, advocate/counsel for respondent no.2 submits on her instructions that she does not want to pursue the case further as all her claims qua the aforesaid fir have been satisfied and she has no objection if the present fir is quashed. 7 learned app for state submits that the investigation of the case is at advanced stage though charge-sheet has not been filed. 8 he further submits that heavy costs should be imposed upon the petitioners before quashing the fir as government machinery and precious time of the court has been consumed. 9 in the above circumstances and in the interest of justice, i quash the fir no. 490/2009, p.s. jahangir puri, and all the emanating proceedings therefrom.10. i find force in the submission made by learned app for state, but refrain imposing costs upon the petitioners in view of their poor financial condition, as petitioner no.1 is working on a meagre salary of rs.3,500/- per month in a factory and other petitioners are the relatives of petitioner no.1.11 criminal m.c. 3804/2011 is allowed and disposed of.12 dasti.

Full Judgment

1 Notice issued.

2 Mr. Navin Sharma, learned APP for State and Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent No.1/State and respondent No.2/complainant.

3 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide FIR No. 490/2009, a case under Section 498A/406/34 IPC was registered at P.S. Jahangirpuri, Delhi against the petitioners on the complaint of respondent No. 2/complainant.

4 It is further submitted that the parties have amicably settled the matter and the marriage between petitioner No.1/husband and respondent No.2/wife has been dissolved amicably vide a decree of mutual consent.

5 Respondent No. 2 is personally present in the court. She has been duly identified by IO/SI Anil Kumar. 6 Mr. Mohan Kumar, Advocate/counsel for respondent No.2 submits on her instructions that she does not want to pursue the case further as all her claims qua the aforesaid FIR have been satisfied and she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. 7 Learned APP for State submits that the investigation of the case is at advanced stage though charge-sheet has not been filed. 8 He further submits that heavy costs should be imposed upon the petitioners before quashing the FIR as Government Machinery and precious time of the court has been consumed. 9 In the above circumstances and in the interest of justice, I quash the FIR No. 490/2009, P.S. Jahangir Puri, and all the emanating proceedings therefrom.

10. I find force in the submission made by learned APP for State, but refrain imposing costs upon the petitioners in view of their poor financial condition, as petitioner No.1 is working on a meagre salary of Rs.3,500/- per month in a factory and other petitioners are the relatives of petitioner No.1.

11 Criminal M.C. 3804/2011 is allowed and disposed of.

12 Dasti.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial