Madhu Panchal Vs. State

Madhu Panchal vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 22, 2011

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/922608

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/922608
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Suresh Kait, J.
Decided On: Nov 22, 2011
Case Number: CRL.REV. P. No.476 of 2011
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Madhu Panchal

Respondent

State

Excerpt

1. in the instant petition the petitioner has sought to consider the order dated 07.09.2011 passed by the ld. addl. sessions judge and revise the said order by setting aside the conditions of depositing rs.01 lakh by way of fdr in the name of trial court.2. on the last date of hearing, i.e., 14.11.2011, ld. counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been amicably settled with the complainant.3. on the statement of the ld. counsel for the petitioner, the io was directed to ensure the presence of the complainant on the next date of hearing. the complainant, namely, roop singh is personally present in the court today, who has been identified by si ashwini nagar, ps karawal nagar.4. the complainant submits that he has settled all the issues qua the aforesaid fir and he does not want to pursue the case.5. the instant petition is a criminal revision. the same is filed against the order dated 07.09.2011 passed by the court below to modify the same. keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 07.09.2011 is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall be released on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.6. therefore, the applicant shall be released on furnishing his personal bond of rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.7. a copy of this order be sent to the jail superintendent for compliance.8. the crl.rev.p. 476/2011 is allowed.9. dasti.

Full Judgment

1. In the instant petition the petitioner has sought to consider the order dated 07.09.2011 passed by the Ld. Addl. Sessions Judge and revise the said order by setting aside the conditions of depositing Rs.01 lakh by way of FDR in the name of Trial Court.

2. On the last date of hearing, i.e., 14.11.2011, ld. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been amicably settled with the complainant.

3. On the statement of the ld. Counsel for the petitioner, the IO was directed to ensure the presence of the complainant on the next date of hearing. The complainant, namely, Roop Singh is personally present in the Court today, who has been identified by SI Ashwini Nagar, PS Karawal Nagar.

4. The complainant submits that he has settled all the issues qua the aforesaid FIR and he does not want to pursue the case.

5. The instant petition is a Criminal Revision. The same is filed against the order dated 07.09.2011 passed by the Court below to modify the same. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 07.09.2011 is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall be released on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

6. Therefore, the applicant shall be released on furnishing his personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.

7. A copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for compliance.

8. The Crl.Rev.P. 476/2011 is allowed.

9. Dasti.

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2011 Same Parties Madhu Panchal vs State Same Subject Education Same Judge Suresh Kait, J.