Ravinder Kapoor Vs. Sushma Kapoor and anr

Ravinder Kapoor vs Sushma Kapoor and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 19, 2011

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/922524

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/922524
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Suresh Kait, J.
Decided On: Oct 19, 2011
Case Number: CRL. Rev. P. No.464 of 2011
Subject: Banking

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Banking

Key legal issue: Banking
Acts & sections: Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 - Section 147

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravinder Kapoor

Respondent

Sushma Kapoor and anr

Legal References

Acts: Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 - Section 147

Excerpt

crl. m.a.12375/2011 (for exemption) allowed, subject to all just exceptions. crl. rev. p. 464/2011 & m.b.1826/20111. notice of the petition and application is accepted by ms.rajdipa behura, addl. pp on behalf of the state/respondent no. 2. respondent no. 1 is personally present in the court and accepts notice.2. the instant revision petition has been filed challenging order dated 12.10.2011 of the learned sessions judge in crl. appeal no. 8/2011 whereby judgment dated 10.01.2011 of the trial court has been upheld and order on sentence dated 15.01.2011 awarding sentence of one year si was reduced to si for 6 months. vide the trial court judgment the petitioner was directed to pay a sum of rs.4.5 lakh as compensation also.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that total amount of rs.4.5 lakh has been paid by the petitioner to the complainant and the complainant does not want to pursue this matter any further.4. since the complainant has come forward and wants to compound the case, therefore, in the interest of justice and as provided under section 147 of the negotiable instrument act, 1881, the same stands compounded.5. consequently, the petitioner is acquitted from the case.6. accordingly, jail authorities are directed to release the petitioner forthwith, if not required in any other case.7. a copy of this order be sent to the concerned superintendent.8. the petition stands disposed of.9. no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

Crl. M.A.12375/2011 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. REV. P. 464/2011 & M.B.1826/2011

1. Notice of the petition and application is accepted by Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Addl. PP on behalf of the State/Respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 1 is personally present in the court and accepts notice.

2. The instant revision petition has been filed challenging order dated 12.10.2011 of the learned Sessions Judge in Crl. Appeal No. 8/2011 whereby judgment dated 10.01.2011 of the trial court has been upheld and order on sentence dated 15.01.2011 awarding sentence of one year SI was reduced to SI for 6 months. Vide the trial court judgment the petitioner was directed to pay a sum of Rs.4.5 lakh as compensation also.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that total amount of Rs.4.5 lakh has been paid by the petitioner to the complainant and the complainant does not want to pursue this matter any further.

4. Since the complainant has come forward and wants to compound the case, therefore, in the interest of justice and as provided under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, the same stands compounded.

5. Consequently, the petitioner is acquitted from the case.

6. Accordingly, Jail authorities are directed to release the petitioner forthwith, if not required in any other case.

7. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned Superintendent.

8. The petition stands disposed of.

9. No order as to costs.

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2011 Same Parties Ravinder Kapoor vs Sushma Kapoor and anr Same Subject Banking Same Judge Suresh Kait, J. Acts & Sections Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 - Section 147