Jharkhand Marandi Vs. State of Jharkhand

c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a no. 6822 of 2011 ------.. -versusthe state of jharkhand coram : ...... opposite party -----honble mr. justice h.c.mishra -----for the petitioner : mr.s.s.choudhary, advocate for the state : mr.md.hatim, a.p.p. -----2/ 11.10.2011 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the state. the petitioner has been made accused in mahagama p.s case no.156 of 2010 corresponding to g.r no.1183 of 2010, t.r no.308 of 2011 for the offence under sections 302, 120b, 34 of the i.p.c and under section 27 of the arms act. the case relates to the murder of one dev narayan hansda @ masterjee. it appears from the f.i.r that some persons have been named in the f.i.r but the petitioner has not been named. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been named in the confessional statement of the co-accused and except this, there is no other material against the petitioner. learned counsel for the petitioner has accordingly prayed for bail. from the impugned order also, it appears that there is only confessional statement of the co-accused against this petitioner. in the facts of this case, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the petitioner jharkhand marandi is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, godda in mahagama p.s case no.156 of 2010 corresponding to g.r no.1183 of 2010, t.r no.308 of 2011.jharkhand marandipetitioner(h.c.mishra, j.)b.s/