Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Karma Oraon Vs. State of Jharkhand

Karma Oraon vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Oct 11, 2011
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/921900

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

C-101, Vasundhara Apartments, Dwarka, New Delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. Regarding property at L-4, Connaught Place, New Delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. Since the defendant is willin...

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Karma Oraon

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no.6861 of 2011 karma oraon versus the state of jharkhand coram: . opposite party honble mr. justice h.c. mishra : : mr. kripa shankar nanda a. p.p. ..... petitionerfor the petitioner for the state 4/11.10.2011----heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the petitioner has been made accused for the offence under sections 395 andprosecution. 397 of the indian penal code, in connection with kolebira p.s. case no.20 of 2008, corresponding to g.r. no.165 of 2008(s). the case relates to bank dacoity. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement. there is no recovery from the petitioner and the petitioner was also not put to t.i.p. learned counsel accordingly prayed for bail. from the impugned order, it appears that petitioner has been made accused in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the petitioner karma oraon is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, simdega, in connection with kolebira p.s. case no.20 of 2008, corresponding to g.r. no.165 of 2008(s). (h. c. mishra, j)r.kumar

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6861 of 2011 Karma Oraon Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda A. P.P. ..... Petitioner

For the Petitioner For the State 4/11.10.2011

----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 395 and

Prosecution. 397 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Kolebira P.S. Case no.20 of 2008, corresponding to G.R. No.165 of 2008(s). The case relates to bank dacoity. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement. There is no recovery from the petitioner and the petitioner was also not put to T.I.P. Learned counsel accordingly prayed for bail. From the impugned order, it appears that petitioner has been made accused in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Karma Oraon is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega, in connection with Kolebira P.S. Case no.20 of 2008, corresponding to G.R. No.165 of 2008(s). (H. C. Mishra, J)

R.Kumar

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial