Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Md. Aslam Vs. State of Jharkhand

Md. Aslam vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Oct 11, 2011
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/921897

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

C-101, Vasundhara Apartments, Dwarka, New Delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. Regarding property at L-4, Connaught Place, New Delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. Since the defendant is willin...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md. Aslam

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no.6842 of 2011 md. aslam versus the state of jharkhand coram: . opposite party honble mr. justice h.c. mishra : : mr. vandana singh a. p.p. ..... petitionerfor the petitioner for the state 2/11.10.2011----heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the petitioner has been made accused for the offence under sections 364a ofprosecution. the indian penal code in connection with hazaribagh sadar p.s. case no.148 of 2011, corresponding to g.r. no.632 of 2011. the case relates to abduction for ransom of one doctor lalit jain and it appears that the said doctor was recovered and he has named this petitioner to be one of the culprits. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, prayer for bail stands rejected. (h. c. mishra, j)r.kumar

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6842 of 2011 Md. Aslam Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. Vandana Singh A. P.P. ..... Petitioner

For the Petitioner For the State 2/11.10.2011

----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 364A of

Prosecution. the Indian Penal Code in connection with Hazaribagh Sadar P.S. Case no.148 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No.632 of 2011. The case relates to abduction for ransom of one doctor Lalit Jain and it appears that the said doctor was recovered and he has named this petitioner to be one of the culprits. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail stands rejected. (H. C. Mishra, J)

R.Kumar

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial