Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rup Chatterjee and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand

Rup Chatterjee and anr vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Oct 11, 2011
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/921896

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

C-101, Vasundhara Apartments, Dwarka, New Delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. Regarding property at L-4, Connaught Place, New Delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. Since the defendant is willin...

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rup Chatterjee and anr

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 2692 of 2011 -----... .... ... .... ...... ... petitioners opp. party1. rup chatterjee 2. jagbandhu chandraversus ------the state of jharkhand coram:hon'ble mr. justice d.n. upadhyay -----for the petitioners : md. zaid ahmad, advocate for the opp. party : a.p.p. ----04 /11.10.2011 heard learned counsel for the parties. petitioners are accused in a case registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 409 & 406/34 of the indian penal code. there is allegation that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons defalcated rs.6,93,697/- in mnrega project. it is submitted that the defalcated money has already been deposited jointly by all the accused persons. the other co-accused namely rajesh kishore narayan and vinay kumar, against whom there is similar allegation, have been granted anticipatory bail by a bench of this court vide a.b.a. no.1900 of 2011 dated 23.06.2011. another co-accused, namely, arbind singh @ arvind singh has also been granted anticipatory bail by a bench of this court vide a.b.a. no.1783 of 2011 dated 14.07.2011. learned counsel for the state opposed the prayer for bail. in the facts and circumstances of the case, since entire amount has already been deposited and co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail, above named petitioners are directed to surrender in the court below within a fortnight and on such surrender or in the event of their arrest they shall be released on bail by the court below on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad in connection with nirsa p.s. case no.91 of 2011corresponding to g.r. case no.1461 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) of the cr.p.c.(d.n. upadhyay, j)nkc

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2692 of 2011 -----... .... ... .... ...... ... Petitioners Opp. Party

1. Rup Chatterjee 2. Jagbandhu Chandra

Versus ------

The State of Jharkhand CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY -----For the Petitioners : Md. Zaid Ahmad, Advocate For the Opp. Party : A.P.P. ----04 /11.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 409 & 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons defalcated Rs.6,93,697/- in MNREGA Project. It is submitted that the defalcated money has already been deposited jointly by all the accused persons. The other co-accused namely Rajesh Kishore Narayan and Vinay Kumar, against whom there is similar allegation, have been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide A.B.A. No.1900 of 2011 dated 23.06.2011. Another co-accused, namely, Arbind Singh @ Arvind Singh has also been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide A.B.A. No.1783 of 2011 dated 14.07.2011. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, since entire amount has already been deposited and co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail, above named petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a fortnight and on such surrender or in the event of their arrest they shall be released on bail by the Court below on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Nirsa P.S. Case No.91 of 2011

corresponding to G.R. Case No.1461 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(D.N. Upadhyay, J)

NKC

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial