Dharmendra Kumar Singh @ Dharmendra Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 7342 of 2011 dharmendra kumar singh @ dharmendra singh..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand . opposite party coram: honble mr. justice h.c. mishra :mr. dilip kumar jaiswal :a. p.p.for the petitioner for the state----2/10.10.2011 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. petitioner has been made accused for the offence under sections 47(a)/47(d)/55/18 of the excise act, in connection with excise case no. 10 of 2011 (t. r. no. 1497 of 2011). from the fir, it appears that a large quantity of illegal liquor and foreign liquor were recovered from the house of one lal bahadur das. it is alleged that the petitioner fled away from the place of occurrence and he could not be apprehended. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the petitioner dharmendra kumar singh @ dharmendra singh is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned sub divisional judicial magistrate, bermo at tenughat in connection with excise case no. 10 of 2011 (t. r. no. 1497 of 2011).(h. c. mishra, j)umesh/-