Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hari Narayan Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Hari Narayan Ram vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Oct 10, 2011
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/921746

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

C-101, Vasundhara Apartments, Dwarka, New Delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. Regarding property at L-4, Connaught Place, New Delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. Since the defendant is willin...

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hari Narayan Ram

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi w.p .(s)no.3377of2011 harinarayanram... ... ... ... ... petitioner versus thestateofjharkhandandothers ... ... respondents coram: hon'blemr.justiced.n.patel forthepetitioner: mr.shivprasad fortherespondents: j.c.tos.c.i th 03/dated:10october,2011 1) counsel for the petitioner submitted that suffice it will be fordisposalofthiswritpetition,ifadirectionisgiventorespondentno.3 thesecretary,departmentofwaterresources,govt.ofjharkhand,nepal house,ranchitotreatthiswritpetitionasarepresentationanddecide thegrievancesventilatedinthiswritpetitionwithregardtobenefitsof assuredcareerprogressionsaswellaspromotion,etcofthepetitioner,in accordancewithlaw,withinstipulatedtime,asgivenbythiscourt. 2) ihaveheardcounselfortherespondents,whohassubmittedthat theyhavenomuchobjection,ifsuchadirectionisgiventorespondent no. 3 to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievancesventilatedinthiswritpetitioninaccordancewithlaw,within thestipulatedtime,asgivenbythiscourt. 3) inviewofthesesubmissions,ihereby,directrespondentno.3to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievances ventilated in this petition with regard to benefits of assured career progressions as well as promotion,etc of the petitioner,in accordance withlaw,rules,regulations,policiesandgovernmentenforceableorders, applicabletothepetitionerasexpeditiouslyaspossibleandpracticable, preferablywithinaperiodofsixteenweeks,fromthedateofreceiptofa copyofanorderofthiscourt,aftergivinganadequateopportunityof beingheardtothepetitionerortohisrepresentatives.ifnecessarydata arerequiredtobecollectedfromthestateofbiharfordecidingtheclaim ofthepetitioner,thesamewillalsobecollectedbytherespondentno.3. 4) inviewoftheabovedirections,thiswritpetitionisdisposedof.manoj/cp.2(d.n.patel,j)

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(S)No.3377of2011 HariNarayanRam... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner: Mr.ShivPrasad FortheRespondents: J.C.ToS.C.I th 03/Dated:10October,2011 1) Counsel for the petitioner submitted that suffice it will be for

disposalofthiswritpetition,ifadirectionisgiventorespondentNo.3 TheSecretary,DepartmentofWaterResources,Govt.ofJharkhand,Nepal House,Ranchitotreatthiswritpetitionasarepresentationanddecide thegrievancesventilatedinthiswritpetitionwithregardtobenefitsof AssuredCareerProgressionsaswellaspromotion,etcofthepetitioner,in accordancewithlaw,withinstipulatedtime,asgivenbythisCourt. 2) Ihaveheardcounselfortherespondents,whohassubmittedthat theyhavenomuchobjection,ifsuchadirectionisgiventorespondent no. 3 to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievancesventilatedinthiswritpetitioninaccordancewithlaw,within thestipulatedtime,asgivenbythisCourt. 3) Inviewofthesesubmissions,Ihereby,directrespondentno.3to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievances ventilated in this petition with regard to benefits of Assured Career Progressions as well as promotion,etc of the petitioner,in accordance withlaw,rules,regulations,policiesandGovernmentenforceableorders, applicabletothepetitionerasexpeditiouslyaspossibleandpracticable, preferablywithinaperiodofsixteenweeks,fromthedateofreceiptofa copyofanorderofthisCourt,aftergivinganadequateopportunityof beingheardtothepetitionerortohisrepresentatives.Ifnecessarydata arerequiredtobecollectedfromtheStateofBiharfordecidingtheclaim ofthepetitioner,thesamewillalsobecollectedbytherespondentNo.3. 4) Inviewoftheabovedirections,thiswritpetitionisdisposedof.

Manoj/cp.2

(D.N.Patel,J)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial