Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Daniels Vs. Craddock

Daniels vs Craddock

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-01-1915
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/92101

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
237 U.S. 574
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Daniels

Respondent

Craddock

Excerpt

daniels v. craddock - 237 u.s. 574 (1915) u.s. supreme court daniels v. craddock, 237 u.s. 574 (1915) daniels v. craddock no. 248 argued april 21, 22, 1915 decided june 1, 1915 237 u.s. 574 appeal from the circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit syllabus decided on authority of daniels v. wagner, ante, p. 237 u. s. 547 . 205 f. 235 reversed. the facts are stated in the opinion. mr. chief justice white delivered the opinion of the court. included among the fifteen cases which were argued by the appellant in a single brief, this case was separately argued by the appellees. the brief pressed upon our attention seven propositions, all of which we are of opinion page 237 u. s. 575 are disposed of by the views announced in daniels v. wagner, ante, p. 237 u. s. 547 (no. 239), since the propositions all in substance either conflict with the finding of the secretary of the interior as to the performance by the lieu applicants of every essential requirement to entitle them to make the entry, or directly or indirectly assert the possession by the land department at least as to the lieu entries, of the discretionary power which was asserted and recognized by the court below. it follows, therefore that, for the reasons here stated and those expressed in no. 239, the judgment must be, and it is, reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this and the opinion in daniels v. wagner, ante, p. 237 u. s. 547 . reversed.

Full Judgment

Daniels v. Craddock - 237 U.S. 574 (1915)
U.S. Supreme Court Daniels v. Craddock, 237 U.S. 574 (1915)

Daniels v. Craddock

No. 248

Argued April 21, 22, 1915

Decided June 1, 1915

237 U.S. 574

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SYLLABUS

Decided on authority of Daniels v. Wagner, ante, p. 237 U. S. 547 .

205 F. 235 reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

Included among the fifteen cases which were argued by the appellant in a single brief, this case was separately argued by the appellees. The brief pressed upon our attention seven propositions, all of which we are of opinion

Page 237 U. S. 575

are disposed of by the views announced in Daniels v. Wagner, ante, p. 237 U. S. 547 (No. 239), since the propositions all in substance either conflict with the finding of the Secretary of the Interior as to the performance by the lieu applicants of every essential requirement to entitle them to make the entry, or directly or indirectly assert the possession by the Land Department at least as to the lieu entries, of the discretionary power which was asserted and recognized by the court below. It follows, therefore that, for the reasons here stated and those expressed in No. 239, the judgment must be, and it is, reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this and the opinion in Daniels v. Wagner, ante, p. 237 U. S. 547 .

Reversed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial