Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shabbir Khan Vs. the State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor

Shabbir Khan vs The State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Jul 06, 2011
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/920521

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Case No. CRLMB - 3851 of 2011
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shabbir Khan

Advocate Shri Amir Aziz, Adv

Respondent

The State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor

Advocate Shri, Sanjeev Kumar Mahala, Adv

Legal References

Acts
Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376

Excerpt

.....be of 24.07.2010. the date of birth of petitioner, according to school certificate, is 20.08.1994. the age on the date of incident he was less than 16 years. in fact the actual dispute was between the petitioner and javed, son of prosecutrix, and that has been made out the false case. the prosecutrix is aged 42 years and mother of four children. the eldest daughter of the prosecutrix is elder than the petitioner and javed, son of prosecutrix, is also more than 11 years. 3. learned public prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, i allow this bail application under section 438 cr.p.c. 5. therefore, the sho/i.o. of police station nagar, district bharatpur, is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, namely, shabbir khan son of shri juhru, resident of nagla shyam, police station nagar, district bharatpur, in fir no.291/2010, registered under section 376 of the ipc, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- 1. he shall make himself available for interrogation by investigating officer as and when required; 2. he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; 3. he shall not leave india without the previous permission of the court. 6. the bail application stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused material made available to me during course of arguments.

2. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that allegation against petitioner is culpably false. It has been alleged that he exploited the prosecutrix and had been doing so at the gun point for last four years. The first information report has been registered on 27.07.2010 and the alleged incident is said to be of 24.07.2010. The date of birth of petitioner, according to school certificate, is 20.08.1994. The age on the date of incident he was less than 16 years. In fact the actual dispute was between the petitioner and Javed, son of prosecutrix, and that has been made out the false case. The prosecutrix is aged 42 years and mother of four children. The eldest daughter of the prosecutrix is elder than the petitioner and Javed, son of prosecutrix, is also more than 11 years.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

4. Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I allow this bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

5. Therefore, the SHO/I.O. of Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur, is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, namely, Shabbir Khan Son of Shri Juhru, Resident of Nagla Shyam, Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur, in FIR No.291/2010, registered under Section 376 of the IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:-

1. He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required;

2. He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer;

3. He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

6. The bail application stands disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial