Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

JahiruddIn Mollah at Jullet.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jul 28, 2011
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/920208

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.R.R.2331 of 2011.
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 337, 427

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

JahiruddIn Mollah at Jullet.

Advocate Mr. Sabir Ahmed; Mr. Bhaskar Hutait. Advs

Respondent

Advocate Mr. Amartya Ghosh. Adv

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 337, 427

Excerpt

1. mr. sabir ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that his client is willing to appear before the court and in that event, he may be allowed to remain in the bail bond furnished by him earlier. 2. mr. ghosh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party/state submits that he has nothing to say in this matter. 3. this case is related to the offences under sections 147/148/149/323/325/337/427 of the indian penal code. the charge sheet has already been filed. the petitioner failed and neglected to appear in the learned trial court despite specific direction. the learned trial court had to issue warrant of arrest. 4. apprehending his arrest, he has come up with this application before this court challenging the order passed by the learned additional chief judicial magistrate, uluberia, howrah. 5. on careful perusal of the order, i find that the same is not suffering from any illegality, incorrectness and impropriety and therefore, without setting aside the order, i dispose of this application with the direction upon the petitioner to appear before the learned additional chief judicial magistrate, uluberia, howrah in connection with g. r. case no.470 of 1989 and file an application praying for allowing him to remain on the bail bond already furnished by him. 6. the learned additional chief judicial magistrate, uluberia, howrah is directed to take the matter lightly and on his prayer, if any, the petitioner may be allowed to remain on the same bail bond furnished by him earlier. warrant of arrest be recalled. 7. let a plain copy of this order countersigned by the assistant registrar (court) be given to mr. ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner so that he can place it before the learned trial court who is directed to act on the same in order to avoid delay.

Full Judgment

1. Mr. Sabir Ahmed, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that his client is willing to appear before the Court and in that event, he may be allowed to remain in the bail bond furnished by him earlier.

2. Mr. Ghosh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party/State submits that he has nothing to say in this matter.

3. This case is related to the offences under Sections 147/148/149/323/325/337/427 of the Indian Penal Code. The charge sheet has already been filed. The petitioner failed and neglected to appear in the learned Trial Court despite specific direction. The learned Trial Court had to issue warrant of arrest.

4. Apprehending his arrest, he has come up with this application before this Court challenging the order passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uluberia, Howrah.

5. On careful perusal of the order, I find that the same is not suffering from any illegality, incorrectness and impropriety and therefore, without setting aside the order, I dispose of this application with the direction upon the petitioner to appear before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uluberia, Howrah in connection with G. R. Case No.470 of 1989 and file an application praying for allowing him to remain on the bail bond already furnished by him.

6. The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uluberia, Howrah is directed to take the matter lightly and on his prayer, if any, the petitioner may be allowed to remain on the same bail bond furnished by him earlier. Warrant of arrest be recalled.

7. Let a plain copy of this order countersigned by the Assistant Registrar (Court) be given to Mr. Ahmed, learned Counsel for the petitioner so that he can place it before the learned Trial Court who is directed to act on the same in order to avoid delay.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial