Rustam Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand

Rustam Ansari vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 23, 2011

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/919255

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/919255
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Judge: D.N. Upadhyay, J.
Decided On: Jun 23, 2011
Case Number: B.A. No.3925 of 2011
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 395

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rustam Ansari

Advocate Mr. Mohit Prakash, Adv.

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 395

Excerpt

1. heard learned counsel for the parties. petitioner is accused in a case registered under section 395 of the indian penal code. 2. according to the fardbeyan dacoity was committed in the premises of mission and the miscreants looted articles belonging to informant and witnesses. 3. during investigation name of present petitioner was disclosed by co-accused and then he has been arrayed as accused in this case. 4. it is submitted that besides extra judicial confession made by co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner to connect him with the alleged occurrence. 5. learned counsel for the state does not dispute above facts. considering the aforesaid aspects of the matter, above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail by the court below on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, simdega in connection with kolebira p.s. case no.26 of 2009 corresponding to g.r. case no.202 of 2009(s).

Full Judgment

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is accused in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. According to the fardbeyan dacoity was committed in the premises of mission and the miscreants looted articles belonging to informant and witnesses.

3. During investigation name of present petitioner was disclosed by co-accused and then he has been arrayed as accused in this case.

4. It is submitted that besides extra judicial confession made by co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner to connect him with the alleged occurrence.

5. Learned counsel for the State does not dispute above facts. Considering the aforesaid aspects of the matter, above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail by the Court below on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega in connection with Kolebira P.S. Case No.26 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. Case No.202 of 2009(S).

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2011 Same Parties Rustam Ansari vs State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal Same Judge D.N. Upadhyay, J. Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 395