Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pierce Vs. United States

Pierce vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-24-1914
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/91910

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
232 U.S. 292
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pierce

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

pierce v. united states - 232 u.s. 292 (1914) u.s. supreme court pierce v. united states , 232 u.s. 292 (1914) pierce v. united states (no. 2) no. 65, 624 argued january 6, 7, 1914 decided february 24, 1914 232 u.s. 292 error to the circuit court of the united states for the southern district of new york syllabus decided on authority of pierce v. united states, ante, p. 232 u. s. 290 . 190 f. 359 reversed. the facts are stated in the opinion. mr. chief justice white delivered the opinion of the court. these cases concern the right to recover a tax on the yacht yacona, becoming due on the first of september, 1910. the complaint filed by the united states in no. 65 was in substance like that filed in the previous cases, and the answer in effect set up the same defenses, especially the defense relating to the nonuse of the yacht. the case, by stipulation, was submitted to the court without a jury, a finding of facts was made which distinctly established page 232 u. s. 293 the nonuse during the taxing year, and the court gave a judgment for the tax, although it rejected the interest, upon the same construction of the act which it applied in the previous cases. the certificate in this as in the other cases is here in consequence of error prosecuted by the united states to the circuit court of appeals because of the rejection of the interest claimed. treating this case as we treated the others, and applying the construction in those cases given, it follows that the judgment in this case must be reversed. and it is so ordered.

Full Judgment

Pierce v. United States - 232 U.S. 292 (1914)
U.S. Supreme Court Pierce v. United States , 232 U.S. 292 (1914)

Pierce v. United States (No. 2)

No. 65, 624

Argued January 6, 7, 1914

Decided February 24, 1914

232 U.S. 292

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SYLLABUS

Decided on authority of Pierce v. United States, ante, p. 232 U. S. 290 .

190 F. 359 reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

These cases concern the right to recover a tax on the yacht Yacona, becoming due on the first of September, 1910. The complaint filed by the United States in No. 65 was in substance like that filed in the previous cases, and the answer in effect set up the same defenses, especially the defense relating to the nonuse of the yacht. The case, by stipulation, was submitted to the court without a jury, a finding of facts was made which distinctly established

Page 232 U. S. 293

the nonuse during the taxing year, and the court gave a judgment for the tax, although it rejected the interest, upon the same construction of the act which it applied in the previous cases. The certificate in this as in the other cases is here in consequence of error prosecuted by the United States to the circuit court of appeals because of the rejection of the interest claimed. Treating this case as we treated the others, and applying the construction in those cases given, it follows that the judgment in this case must be reversed.

And it is so ordered.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial