Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt.Belan and Another Vs. State of U.P.

Smt.Belan and Another vs State of U.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Oct 27, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/918322

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30104 of 2010
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt.Belan and Another

Advocate Hemant Kumar; Kamal Krishna, Advs

Respondent

State of U.P.

Advocate Govt. Advocate

Excerpt

1. heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned a.g.a. appearing for the state. 2. it is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants are parent-in-laws of the deceased. there is general allegation against them and they have been falsely implicated in this case. no overtact has been assigned to them. 3. learned a.g.a. contended that the applicants along with co-accused were involved in committing the murder of the deceased. 4. applicants are parent-in-laws of the deceased. no overtact has been assigned to them. 5. considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, distinguishing the case of the applicant to the husband of the deceased, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail. 6. let the applicants smt. belan and prabhu pasi involved in case crime no. 374 of 2010 under sections 498-a, 304-b ipc & section 3/4 d.p.act, police station soraon, district allahabad be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Full Judgment

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants are parent-in-laws of the deceased. There is general allegation against them and they have been falsely implicated in this case. No overtact has been assigned to them.

3. Learned A.G.A. contended that the applicants along with co-accused were involved in committing the murder of the deceased.

4. Applicants are parent-in-laws of the deceased. No overtact has been assigned to them.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, distinguishing the case of the applicant to the husband of the deceased, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

6. Let the applicants Smt. Belan and Prabhu Pasi involved in Case Crime No. 374 of 2010 under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC & Section 3/4 D.P.Act, Police Station Soraon, District Allahabad be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial