Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Niraj kumar and ors. Vs. the state of jharkhand

Niraj kumar and ors. vs the state of jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 02, 2011
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/918282

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
B.A.  No. 4023 of 2011
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 324, 341, 323, 504, 509, 307, 34

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Niraj kumar and ors.

Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv.

Respondent

the state of jharkhand

Advocate Mr. P.K. Appu, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 324, 341, 323, 504, 509, 307, 34

Excerpt

1. heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the state. the petitioners are accused in this case registered under sections 324/341/323/504/509, 307/34 of the indian penal code. 2. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant party was aggressor and he has lodged case against the petitioners earlier to the present case. it is further submitted that petitioner no. 2 has also received some injury for which, he was admitted in rims for a week and, thereafter, he has surrendered before the court in connection with the present case. 3. learned counsel for the petitioners, has further submitted that both the petitioners are in custody from 04.05.2011. 4. considering the fact and circumstance of the case and considering the fact that the petitioners are in custody for nearly a month, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, bokaro in connection with marafari p.s. case no. 23 of 2011, corresponding to g.r. no. 477 of 2011, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be their close relative having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the trial court concerned.

Full Judgment

1. Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the State.

The petitioners are accused in this case registered under Sections 324/341/323/504/509, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant party was aggressor and he has lodged case against the petitioners earlier to the present case. It is further submitted that petitioner no. 2 has also received some injury for which, he was admitted in RIMS for a week and, thereafter, he has surrendered before the court in connection with the present case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, has further submitted that both the petitioners are in custody from 04.05.2011.

4. Considering the fact and circumstance of the case and considering the fact that the petitioners are in custody for nearly a month, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro in connection with Marafari P.S. Case No. 23 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 477 of 2011, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be their close relative having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the trial court concerned.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial