Satendra Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Satendra Singh and Others vs State of U.P. and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Nov 15, 2010

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/918196

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/918196
Court: Allahabad High Court
Judge: Ravindra Singh; Arvind Kumar Tripathi, JJ.
Decided On: Nov 15, 2010
Case Number: CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3502 of 2010
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satendra Singh and Others

Advocate Raj Singh, Adv

Respondent

State of U.P. and Others

Advocate Govt. Advocate; Sudhir Dixit, Adv

Excerpt

1. list revised. learned counsel for the petitioners is not present. 2. heard learned a.g.a. and perused the record. 3. this petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the impugned first information report of case crime no.15 of 2010 under section 498a, 323 i.p.c. & 3/4 d.p. act, ps. palimukimpur, district aligarh. 4. on the request of learned counsel for the petitioners this matter was referred to the mediation centre of this court. the report of the mediation centre shows that the mediation has been completed but no agreement could be arrived in between the parties. the allegations made in the first information report are prima facie disclosing the commission of offence punishable under sections 498a, 506 i.p.c. & 3/4 d.p. act. 5. in view of the above, there is no good ground to interfere with the case and the prayer for quashing the impugned first information report is refused. the interim order dated 9.3.2010 is hereby vacated. 6. however, considering the fact and circumstances of the case it is directed that in case the petitioners appear before the court concerned within thirty days from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and disposed of in strict compliance of the directions given by full bench of this court in the case of smt.amrawati and another vs. state of u.p. (2004) (57) alr, 390. 7. with the above direction this petition is finally disposed of.

Full Judgment

1. List revised. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not present.

2. Heard learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

3. This petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report of Case Crime No.15 of 2010 under section 498A, 323 I.P.C. & 3/4 D.P. Act, PS. Palimukimpur, District Aligarh.

4. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioners this matter was referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court. The report of the Mediation Centre shows that the mediation has been completed but no agreement could be arrived in between the parties. The allegations made in the First Information Report are prima facie disclosing the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A, 506 I.P.C. & 3/4 D.P. Act.

5. In view of the above, there is no good ground to interfere with the case and the prayer for quashing the impugned First Information Report is refused. The interim order dated 9.3.2010 is hereby vacated.

6. However, considering the fact and circumstances of the case it is directed that in case the petitioners appear before the court concerned within thirty days from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and disposed of in strict compliance of the directions given by full bench of this Court in the case of Smt.Amrawati and another vs. State of U.P. (2004) (57) ALR, 390.

7. With the above direction this petition is finally disposed of.

Same Court & Year Allahabad · 2010 Same Parties Satendra Singh and Others vs State of U.P. and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Ravindra Singh; Arvind Kumar Tripathi, JJ.