AmitÂ kumarÂ sharmaÂ @Â amitÂ sharma and Others Vs. the State of Jharkhand

AmitÂ kumarÂ sharmaÂ @Â amitÂ sharma and Others vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided May 25, 2011

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/917804

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/917804
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Judge: H. C. Mishra, J.
Decided On: May 25, 2011
Case Number: B.A.Â No.Â 3896Â ofÂ 2011
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420/468/486/120B, The Copy Right Act - Sections 63/65

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

AmitÂ kumarÂ sharmaÂ @Â amitÂ sharma and Others

Advocate Mr.Â AjayÂ KumarÂ Sah, Adv.

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Advocate Mr.Â R.C.P.Â Sah, Adv.

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420/468/486/120B, The Copy Right Act - Sections 63/65

Excerpt

1. learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make correction in the name of petitioner no.2. 2. heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. petitioners have been made accused for the offence under sections 420/468/486/120b of the indian penal code and section 63/65 of the copy right act in connection with jugsalai p.s. case no. 48 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 789 of 2011. 3. petitioners are made accused for the offence of making spurious cement and in that process petitioners were allegedly apprehended. from the f.i.r. itself it is apparent that the petitioners are only laborers engaged by the persons for the purpose of making spurious cement. 4. learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are only daily wages laborers. learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed for bail. 5. learned a.p.p. on the other hand has opposed the prayer for bail. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. accordingly, the petitioners, amit kumar sharma @ amit sharma, rakesh kumar @ rajesh kumar, mohan sahu, kishor sahu, ram narayan lal and shankar sardar @ sankar das @ taklu are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/ (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, jamshedpur in connection with jugsalai p.s. case no. 48 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 789 of 2011.

Full Judgment

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make correction in the name of petitioner no.2.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the prosecution. Petitioners have been made accused for the offence under Sections 420/468/486/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 63/65 of the Copy Right Act in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No. 48 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 789 of 2011.

3. Petitioners are made accused for the offence of making spurious cement and in that process petitioners were allegedly apprehended. From the F.I.R. itself it is apparent that the petitioners are only laborers engaged by the persons for the purpose of making spurious cement.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are only daily wages laborers. Learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed for bail.

5. Learned A.P.P. on the other hand has opposed the prayer for bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, Amit Kumar Sharma @ Amit Sharma, Rakesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar, Mohan Sahu, Kishor Sahu, Ram Narayan Lal and Shankar Sardar @ Sankar Das @ Taklu are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/ (Rupees Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No. 48 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 789 of 2011.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2011 Same Parties AmitÂ kumarÂ sharmaÂ @Â amitÂ sharma and Others vs The S... Same Subject Criminal Same Judge H. C. Mishra, J. Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420/468/486/120B, The Copy...