Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deepak Kumar @ Sandeep Jee Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Deepak Kumar @ Sandeep Jee vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided May 25, 2011
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/917803

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
B.A. No. 2186 of 2011
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 457, 380, 411, 120(B)/34; The Arms Act - Sections 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)a, 26, 35; C.L.A Act - Section 17

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak Kumar @ Sandeep Jee

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 457, 380, 411, 120(B)/34; The Arms Act - Sections 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)a, 26, 35; C.L.A Act - Section 17

Excerpt

1. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. petitioner has been made accused in connection with sadar town p.s. case no. 120 of 2009 for the offence under sections 457, 380, 411 and 120 (b)/34 of the indian penal code and sections 25 (1-aa), 25 (1-b) a, 26 and 35 of the arms act and section 17 of the c.l.a. act, which relates to the theft of the fire arms from the police barrack. 2. the petitioner has not been named in the f.i.r. but from the impugned order, it appears that during investigation, some accused persons were apprehended who disclosed that it was the petitioner and his brother who had hatched conspiracy for theft of the sophisticated and automatic fire-arms and ammunition from the police magazine for their sale to tpc, an extremist outfit of which the petitioner was an active member. 3. learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that the other co-accused persons have already been granted bail in this case by this court and also attached the copies of the bail orders.  4. in the facts and circumstances and particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner has been named only in the confessional statement of the coaccused, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the petitioner, deepak kumar @ sandeep jee is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate palamau, daltonganj in connection with  sadar town p.s. case no. 120 of 2009 corresponding to g.r. no. 500 of 2009.

Full Judgment

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sadar Town P.S. Case No. 120 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 457, 380, 411 and 120 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 (1-AA), 25 (1-B) a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, which relates to the theft of the fire arms from the Police barrack.

2. The petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R. but from the impugned order, it appears that during investigation, some accused persons were apprehended who disclosed that it was the petitioner and his brother who had hatched conspiracy for theft of the sophisticated and automatic fire-arms and ammunition from the Police Magazine for their sale to TPC, an extremist outfit of which the petitioner was an active member.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that the other co-accused persons have already been granted bail in this case by this Court and also attached the copies of the bail orders. 

4. In the facts and circumstances and particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner has been named only in the confessional statement of the coaccused, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Deepak Kumar @ Sandeep Jee is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Palamau, Daltonganj in connection with  Sadar Town P.S. Case No. 120 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. No. 500 of 2009.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial