Abhay Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Abhay Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Ranchi Decided May 16, 2011

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/917652

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/917652
Court: Jharkhand Ranchi High Court
Judge: Pradeep Kumar
Decided On: May 16, 2011
Case Number: A. B.A. No. 874 of 2011
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[Pradeep Kumar] Indian Penal Code Section 147 - Punishment for rioting -- The petitioner who is an accused for offence under Sections 147,148,149,324,307 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act prays for anticipatory bail expressing apprehending of his arrest in connection with Kotwali P....

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 307, 120B; Arms Act - Section 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 438(2)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abhay Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 307, 120B; Arms Act - Section 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 438(2)

Excerpt

[pradeep kumar] indian penal code section 147 - punishment for rioting -- the petitioner who is an accused for offence under sections 147,148,149,324,307 and 120-b of the indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act prays for anticipatory bail expressing apprehending of his arrest in connection with kotwali p.s. case no. 14 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 85 of 2011. learned counsel for the state opposed the prayer. in that view of the matter, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be surrender before the court below within two weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, ranchi in connection with kotwali p.s. case no. 14 of 2011 g.r. no. 85 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c.and further conditions that one of the bailors will be the local resident having property within the jurisdiction of the court as well as petitioner is directed to appear once in every month on the date fixed in this case, otherwise his bail bond shall stands cancelled.1. the petitioner who is an accused for offence under sections 147,148,149,324,307 and 120-b of the indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act prays for anticipatory bail expressing apprehending of his arrest in connection with kotwali p.s. case no. 14 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 85 of 2011. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as per f.i.r. there is no allegation against the petitioner is that he was present at the place of occurrence and at the end of the f.i.r. he has been named as conspirator who brought some unknown person who fired upon the accused person. learned counsel for the state opposed the prayer. in that view of the matter, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be surrender before the court below within two weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, ranchi in connection with kotwali p.s. case no. 14 of 2011 g.r. no. 85 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c.and further conditions that one of the bailors will be the local resident having property within the jurisdiction of the court as well as petitioner is directed to appear once in every month on the date fixed in this case, otherwise his bail bond shall stands cancelled.

Full Judgment

1. The petitioner who is an accused for offence under Sections 147,148,149,324,307 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act prays for anticipatory bail expressing apprehending of his arrest in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 14 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 85 of 2011. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as per F.I.R. there is no allegation against the petitioner is that he was present at the place of occurrence and at the end of the F.I.R. he has been named as conspirator who brought some unknown person who fired upon the accused person. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer. In that view of the matter, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be surrender before the court below within two weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 14 of 2011 G.R. No. 85 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.and further conditions that one of the bailors will be the local resident having property within the jurisdiction of the Court as well as petitioner is directed to appear once in every month on the date fixed in this case, otherwise his bail bond shall stands cancelled.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand Ranchi · 2011 Same Parties Abhay Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Pradeep Kumar Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 307, 1...

Criminal