Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanjay Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Others

Sanjay Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Ranchi Decided May 16, 2011
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/917650

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand Ranchi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Cr.M.P. No.602 of 2010
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[D.K. Sinha] - Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125(3) - Order for maintenance of wives, children and parents -- 8/ 16.5.2011 Instant interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner Sanjay Kumar with the prayer for quashing/setting aside of the order dated 14.2.2011, by which the learned Prin...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 125(3); Indian Penal Code

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjay Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand and Others

Legal References

Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 125(3); Indian Penal Code

Excerpt

[d.k. sinha] - code of criminal procedure section 125(3) - order for maintenance of wives, children and parents -- 8/ 16.5.2011 instant interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner sanjay kumar with the prayer for quashing/setting aside of the order dated 14.2.2011, by which the learned principal judge, family court, ranchi directed for attachment of the salary of the petitioner under section 125(3) of the code of criminal procedure for not making payment of ad interim maintenance to the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 of the main petition except that only a sum of rs.10,000/- was paid towards arrears. i find from the perusal of the order dated 14.2.2011, recorded by the learned principal judge, family court, ranchi that by the order dated 4.3.2010, petitioner was directed to make payment of rs.3000/- per month each to the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 being wife and minor daughter total a sum of rs.6000/- and rs.5,000/- in lump sum being the litigation cost, but the principal judge observed that his order was flouted. heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2 and 3. the petitioner is directed to deposit the said amount before the principal judge, family court, ranchi in maintenance case no.75/2009 with the liberty to the opposite party no.2 to receive the amount on her behalf and on behalf of her minor daughter opposite party no.3 herein......was assessed rs.20,000/- per month.2. from perusal of the entire order dated 14.2.2011, i do not find any illegality or irregularity therein.3. learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that lenient view may be taken by vacating the order, by which salary of the petitioner has been attached because the petitioner has to take care of his ailing mother and that on account of financial constraints, he could not pay the ad interim monthly maintenance to his wife and daughter within time, yet, he is inclined to pay the arrears in instalment and to keep his wife and daughter with him with all humility and honour.4. heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2 and 3.5. having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, attachment of the salary of the petitioner sanjay kumar by order dated 14.2.2011 shall be put in abeyance till further order, subject to payment of rs.50,000/- in lump sum positively by 16th of june, 2011, failing to which appropriate order shall be passed against him. the petitioner is directed to deposit the said amount before the principal judge, family court, ranchi in maintenance case no.75/2009 with the liberty to the opposite party no.2 to receive the amount on her behalf and on behalf of her minor daughter opposite party no.3 herein. accordingly, i.a. no.907 of 2011 stands disposed of.(cr.m.p. no.602 of 2010)6. let this petition be put up on 20 th of june, 2011 facilitating the parties for reconciliation.

Full Judgment

1. 8/ 16.5.2011 Instant interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner Sanjay Kumar with the prayer for quashing/setting aside of the order dated 14.2.2011, by which the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi directed for attachment of the salary of the petitioner under Section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for not making payment of ad interim maintenance to the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 of the main petition except that only a sum of Rs.10,000/- was paid towards arrears. I find from the perusal of the order dated 14.2.2011, recorded by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi that by the order dated 4.3.2010, petitioner was directed to make payment of Rs.3000/- per month each to the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 being wife and minor daughter total a sum of Rs.6000/- and Rs.5,000/- in lump sum being the litigation cost, but the Principal Judge observed that his order was flouted. The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher in the Government Primary School, Jobla near Kuju within the revenue district of Ramgarh and his income was assessed Rs.20,000/- per month.

2. From perusal of the entire order dated 14.2.2011, I do not find any illegality or irregularity therein.

3. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that lenient view may be taken by vacating the order, by which salary of the petitioner has been attached because the petitioner has to take care of his ailing mother and that on account of financial constraints, he could not pay the ad interim monthly maintenance to his wife and daughter within time, yet, he is inclined to pay the arrears in instalment and to keep his wife and daughter with him with all humility and honour.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, attachment of the salary of the petitioner Sanjay Kumar by order dated 14.2.2011 shall be put in abeyance till further order, subject to payment of Rs.50,000/- in lump sum positively by 16th of June, 2011, failing to which appropriate order shall be passed against him. The petitioner is directed to deposit the said amount before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi in Maintenance Case No.75/2009 with the liberty to the opposite party No.2 to receive the amount on her behalf and on behalf of her minor daughter opposite party No.3 herein. Accordingly, I.A. No.907 of 2011 stands disposed of.

(Cr.M.P. No.602 of 2010)

6. Let this petition be put up on 20 th of June, 2011 facilitating the parties for reconciliation.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial