Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Manager, A.U.P.School. Vs. the State of KeralA.

The Manager, A.U.P.School. vs The State of KeralA.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 17, 2010
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/917149

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C).No. 36657 of 2010(F)
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO, J.] This CRL.A filed u/s.374(2) CR.P.C. by the advocate for the appellant against the judgment dt. 14.7.05 passed by the dist. & SJ., fast track court II, shimoga, in s.c.no,71/02 -convicting the appellant/accused for the offence p/u/s.326 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo S.I. for 5 years ...

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Manager, A.U.P.School.

Advocate SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, Adv.

Respondent

The State of KeralA.

Legal References

Reported In
ILR2010(4)Ker729

Excerpt

[mr.justice b.v.pinto, j.] this crl.a filed u/s.374(2) cr.p.c. by the advocate for the appellant against the judgment dt. 14.7.05 passed by the dist. & sj., fast track court ii, shimoga, in s.c.no,71/02 -convicting the appellant/accused for the offence p/u/s.326 of ipc and sentencing him to undergo s.i. for 5 years and to pay a fine of rs.3000/- i.d., s.i. for 6 months for the offence p/u/s.326 of ipc.1. the 2nd petitioner was appointed by the 1st petitioner as a full time sanskrit teacher on 2.6.2008 in a retirement vacancy in an aided school. the 5th respondent, a.e.o refused to approve the said appointment. appeal filed by the 1st petitioner-manager against the order of the 5th respondent was rejected by the director of public instruction by ext. p1 order. while so, for the academic year 2007- 2008, the aeo abolished the existing full time post of sanskrit teacher by ext. p3 order. appeal filed by the 1st petitioner against ext. p3 order was rejected by the deputy director of education by ext. p4 order and by the d.p.i by ext. p5 order. against the same, the 1st petitioner has filed exts.p6 and p7 revision petitions. the petitioners seek disposal of exts.p6 and p7 expeditiously. 2. i have heard the learned government pleader also. 3. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on exts.p.p6 and p7, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. the writ petition is disposed of as above.

Full Judgment

1. The 2nd petitioner was appointed by the 1st petitioner as a full time Sanskrit teacher on 2.6.2008 in a retirement vacancy in an aided school. The 5th respondent, A.E.O refused to approve the said appointment. Appeal filed by the 1st petitioner-manager against the order of the 5th respondent was rejected by the Director of Public Instruction by Ext. P1 order. While so, for the academic year 2007- 2008, the AEO abolished the existing full time post of Sanskrit teacher by Ext. P3 order. Appeal filed by the 1st petitioner against Ext. P3 order was rejected by the Deputy Director of Education by Ext. P4 order and by the D.P.I by Ext. P5 order. Against the same, the 1st petitioner has filed Exts.P6 and P7 revision petitions. The petitioners seek disposal of Exts.P6 and P7 expeditiously.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.

3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P.P6 and P7, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial