Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Manager. Vs. the State of KeralA.

The Manager. vs The State of KeralA.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 17, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/917132

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C).No. 33631 of 2010(D)
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO, J.] This CRL.A filed u/s.374(2) CR.P.C. by the advocate for the appellant against the judgment dt. 14.7.05 passed by the dist. & SJ., fast track court II, shimoga, in s.c.no,71/02 -convicting the appellant/accused for the offence p/u/s.326 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo S.I. for 5 years ...

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Manager.

Advocate SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, Adv.

Respondent

The State of KeralA.

Legal References

Reported In
ILR2010(4)Ker729

Excerpt

[mr.justice b.v.pinto, j.] this crl.a filed u/s.374(2) cr.p.c. by the advocate for the appellant against the judgment dt. 14.7.05 passed by the dist. & sj., fast track court ii, shimoga, in s.c.no,71/02 -convicting the appellant/accused for the offence p/u/s.326 of ipc and sentencing him to undergo s.i. for 5 years and to pay a fine of rs.3000/- i.d., s.i. for 6 months for the offence p/u/s.326 of ipc.1. the petitioner is a manager of an aided u.p. school in valappad educations sub district. the government has recently announced a decision to upgrade the schools in the educational district. according to the petitioner, the petitioner's school satisfies all the conditions for upgradation of the school as a high school. seeking the same, the petitioner has filed exts.p1 and p7 before the 1st respondent. the petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the same while considering the upgradation of the schools in the educational district. 2. having the learned government pleader also, i dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider exts. p1 and p7 also, while considering the question of upgradation of schools in the educational district.

Full Judgment

1. The petitioner is a manager of an aided U.P. School in Valappad Educations Sub District. The Government has recently announced a decision to upgrade the schools in the educational district. According to the petitioner, the petitioner's school satisfies all the conditions for upgradation of the school as a high school. Seeking the same, the petitioner has filed Exts.P1 and P7 before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the same while considering the upgradation of the schools in the educational district.

2. Having the learned Government Pleader also, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Exts. P1 and P7 also, while considering the question of upgradation of schools in the educational district.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial