Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Branch Manager. Vs. State of KeralA.

Branch Manager. vs State of KeralA.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 17, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/917131

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C).No. 14979 of 2007(G)
Subject
Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO, J.] This CRL.A filed u/s.374(2) CR.P.C. by the advocate for the appellant against the judgment dt. 14.7.05 passed by the dist. & SJ., fast track court II, shimoga, in s.c.no,71/02 -convicting the appellant/accused for the offence p/u/s.326 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo S.I. for 5 years ...

Key legal issue
Constitution

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Branch Manager.

Advocate SRI.RAJAN P.KALIYATH, Adv.

Respondent

State of KeralA.

Legal References

Reported In
ILR2010(4)Ker729

Excerpt

[mr.justice b.v.pinto, j.] this crl.a filed u/s.374(2) cr.p.c. by the advocate for the appellant against the judgment dt. 14.7.05 passed by the dist. & sj., fast track court ii, shimoga, in s.c.no,71/02 -convicting the appellant/accused for the offence p/u/s.326 of ipc and sentencing him to undergo s.i. for 5 years and to pay a fine of rs.3000/- i.d., s.i. for 6 months for the offence p/u/s.326 of ipc.1. sri. rajan p.kaliyath, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition any further. in the light of the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Full Judgment

1. Sri. Rajan P.Kaliyath, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition any further. In the light of the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial