Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sunil P.George. Vs. Controller of Examinations.

Sunil P.George. vs Controller of Examinations.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 15, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/917001

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C).No. 37381 of 2010(W)
Subject
Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY, J.] This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the Respondent draw and pay the provisional pension from 08.04.2000 to till completion of enquiry. Thereafter issue further direction the period from 20.01,1995 onwards till the enq...

Key legal issue
Constitution

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil P.George.

Advocate SRI.SUNNY XAVIER, Adv.

Respondent

Controller of Examinations.

Excerpt

[mr. justice anand byrareddy, j.] this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to direct the respondent draw and pay the provisional pension from 08.04.2000 to till completion of enquiry. thereafter issue further direction the period from 20.01,1995 onwards till the enquiry completed to treat the period as on duty in the event of charges and to du-w and pay all consequential benefits and etc.1. petitioner has completed b.tech electronics and communication engineering. when the result of the 5th semester supplementary examination was declared, he had failed in one paper. he applied for revaluation and approached this court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. i heard the standing counsel appearing for the 1st respondent university. 3. having regard to the above, i dispose of the writ petition directing the university to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance.

Full Judgment

1. Petitioner has completed B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering. When the result of the 5th Semester supplementary examination was declared, he had failed in one paper. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation.

2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent University.

3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order.

Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial