Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aboobacker M. Vs. State of KeralA.

Aboobacker M. vs State of KeralA.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 29, 2010
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/916837

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl..No. 3207 of 2010
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[MR JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA, J.] This criminal petition is filed under section 482 read with 427 cr.p.c. praying to direct. all the sentences to run concurrently awarded in c.c.no.2163/2004 dated 16.12,2004, c.c.no.2 199/2004 dated 14.02.2005 and c.c.n0.2241 /2004 dated 16.12.2004 respectively passed by the JM...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 498A read with 34

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aboobacker M.

Advocate SRI.SUNNY MATHEW, Adv.

Respondent

State of KeralA.

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 498A read with 34
Reported In
ILR2010(4)Ker896

Excerpt

[mr justice k. n. keshavanarayana, j.] this criminal petition is filed under section 482 read with 427 cr.p.c. praying to direct. all the sentences to run concurrently awarded in c.c.no.2163/2004 dated 16.12,2004, c.c.no.2 199/2004 dated 14.02.2005 and c.c.n0.2241 /2004 dated 16.12.2004 respectively passed by the jmfc. ii court, davanagere and confirmed by the appeliate court at davanagere in crl.a.no. 19/2005 dated 27.09.2005, crl.a.no.88/2005 dated 17.09.2005 and crl.a.no. 18/2005 dated 27.09.2004 passed by additional sessions judge, ftc-ii, davanagere. 1. this petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. the alleged offence is under section 498a read with section 34 of the indian penal code. according to prosecution, petitioners (accused nos.1 and 2), who are husband and mother- in-law of defacto complainant physically and mentally tortured her and committed the offences, demanding more dowry. 3. learned counsel for petitioners submitted that first accused had a stroke and one side of his body is paralysed. the second accused is the mother-in-law, against whom, there are no serious allegations. 4. learned public prosecutor also conceded that as against second accused, no serious allegations are made, but the main allegations are made against first accused. 5. on hearing both sides and considering the submissions made in respect of second accused, i find that anticipatory bail can be granted to her. but, as far as first accused is concerned, allegations are serious in nature and this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. though first accused would claim that he had a stroke and he is paralysed, there is absolutely nothing on record to substantiate this. the first accused shall surrender before investigating officer and co- operate with the investigation, without any delay. 6. hence, the following order is passed: (1) the prayer for anticipatory bail by first accused is rejected. (2) the second accused shall surrender before the magistrate court concerned within seven days from today. (3) on such surrender, second accused shall be released on bail, on her executing a bond for rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate, on the following conditions : (i) the second accused shall report before the investigating officer as and when directed and co-operate with the investigation. (ii) in case second accused is involved in any offence of similar nature, her bail is liable to be cancelled. petition is partly allowed.

Full Judgment

1. This petition is for anticipatory bail.

2. The alleged offence is under Section 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, petitioners (accused nos.1 and 2), who are husband and mother- in-law of defacto complainant physically and mentally tortured her and committed the offences, demanding more dowry.

3. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that first accused had a stroke and one side of his body is paralysed. The second accused is the mother-in-law, against whom, there are no serious allegations.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor also conceded that as against second accused, no serious allegations are made, but the main allegations are made against first accused.

5. On hearing both sides and considering the submissions made in respect of second accused, I find that anticipatory bail can be granted to her. But, as far as first accused is concerned, allegations are serious in nature and this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Though first accused would claim that he had a stroke and he is paralysed, there is absolutely nothing on record to substantiate this. The first accused shall surrender before Investigating Officer and co- operate with the investigation, without any delay.

6. Hence, the following order is passed:

(1) The prayer for anticipatory bail by first accused is rejected.

(2) The second accused shall surrender before the Magistrate Court concerned within seven days from today.

(3) On such surrender, second accused shall be released on bail, on her executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate, on the following conditions :

(i) The second accused shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when directed and co-operate with the investigation.

(ii) In case second accused is involved in any offence of similar nature, her bail is liable to be cancelled. Petition is partly allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial