Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Andrews Vs. Partridge

Andrews vs Partridge

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-28-1913
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/91568

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
228 U.S. 479
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Andrews

Respondent

Partridge

Excerpt

.....representative is entitled to the balance of page 228 u. s. 480 the value thereof, and that the subsequent death of the bankrupt had no effect on this division even though it occurred before adjudication. 191 f. 325 reversed. the facts, which involve the construction of § 70a of the bankruptcy act and the ownership of policies of insurance on the life of a bankrupt, are stated in the opinion. mr. justice day delivered the opinion of the court. harvey k. partridge, trustee in bankruptcy of benajah d. andrews, by petition filed in the united states district court for the district of new jersey, sought to acquire the title to the proceeds of certain insurance policies upon the life of benajah d. andrews, bankrupt, deceased, a claim to such proceeds having been made by the executrix of andrews' estate. an order having been entered in the district court in favor of the executrix, except as to the cash surrender value of the policies, the circuit court of appeals for the third circuit, upon a petition to revise, reversed the decree of the district court and ordered that the proceeds pass entirely to the trustee. 191 f. 325. to review that decree, this writ of certiorari was issued. it appears from the finding of facts by the circuit court of appeals that a petition in involuntary bankruptcy was filed against andrews on february 3, 1910; that, on april 4, 1910, he was adjudicated a bankrupt, and on april 28th of the same year a trustee was elected and qualified. it further appears that andrews died on february 15, 1910, page 228 u. s. 481 having at that time, and at the time of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, two policies of insurance upon his life, one for $10,000, payable upon his death to his executors, administrators, or assigns, and the other for $5,000, payable upon his death to his estate. at the date of filing the petition in bankruptcy, the $10,000 policy had a cash surrender value of $14.93, and was subject to.....

Full Judgment

Andrews v. Partridge - 228 U.S. 479 (1913)
U.S. Supreme Court Andrews v. Partridge, 228 U.S. 479 (1913)

Andrews v. Partridge

No. 496

Argued March 13, 1913

Decided April 28, 1913

228 U.S. 479

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

SYLLABUS

Burlingham v. Crouse, ante, p. 229 U. S. 459 , and Everett v. Judson, ante, p. 229 U. S. 474 , followed to effect that, under § 70a of the Bankruptcy Act, the trustee is only entitled to the cash surrender value of insurance policies on the life of the bankrupt at the time of the filing of the petition, and that the bankrupt or his representative is entitled to the balance of

Page 228 U. S. 480

the value thereof, and that the subsequent death of the bankrupt had no effect on this division even though it occurred before adjudication.

191 F. 325 reversed.

The facts, which involve the construction of § 70a of the Bankruptcy Act and the ownership of policies of insurance on the life of a bankrupt, are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

Harvey K. Partridge, trustee in bankruptcy of Benajah D. Andrews, by petition filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sought to acquire the title to the proceeds of certain insurance policies upon the life of Benajah D. Andrews, bankrupt, deceased, a claim to such proceeds having been made by the executrix of Andrews' estate. An order having been entered in the district court in favor of the executrix, except as to the cash surrender value of the policies, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, upon a petition to revise, reversed the decree of the district court and ordered that the proceeds pass entirely to the trustee. 191 F. 325. To review that decree, this writ of certiorari was issued.

It appears from the finding of facts by the circuit court of appeals that a petition in involuntary bankruptcy was filed against Andrews on February 3, 1910; that, on April 4, 1910, he was adjudicated a bankrupt, and on April 28th of the same year a trustee was elected and qualified. It further appears that Andrews died on February 15, 1910,

Page 228 U. S. 481

having at that time, and at the time of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, two policies of insurance upon his life, one for $10,000, payable upon his death to his executors, administrators, or assigns, and the other for $5,000, payable upon his death to his estate. At the date of filing the petition in bankruptcy, the $10,000 policy had a cash surrender value of $14.93, and was subject to a loan of $4,481.39, and the $5,000 policy had a cash surrender value of $100. Under a stipulation between the trustee and the executrix, the net proceeds of the two policies were paid to the trustee, to be held until the title thereto had been determined.

The district court decreed that the trustee was entitled to the cash surrender value of the policies as of the date of the filing of the petition, and that the bankrupt estate had no interest in the balance of the proceeds of the policies. The circuit court of appeals also held that the cash surrender value of the policies must be ascertained as of the date of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy. Construing § 70a of the Bankruptcy Act, it decided, however, that the policies passed to the trustee, subject to the right of the bankrupt to pay or secure to the trustee the cash surrender value of the policies, and to continue to hold and own them, but that this right was extinguished by his death before adjudication.

This case was argued and submitted at the same time as the cases of Burlingham v. Crouse, ante, p. 229 U. S. 459 , and Everett v. Judson, ante, p. 229 U. S. 474 . An application of the principles therein laid down requires the reversal of the judgment of the circuit court of appeals, and it is accordingly

Reversed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial