Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Knott Vs. St. Louis, Kansas City and Colorado R. Co.

Knott vs St. Louis, Kansas City and Colorado R. Co.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-16-1913
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/91466

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
230 U.S. 512
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Knott

Respondent

St. Louis, Kansas City and Colorado R. Co.

Excerpt

knott v. st. louis, kansas city & colorado r. co. - 230 u.s. 512 (1913) u.s. supreme court knott v. st. louis, kansas city & colorado r. co., 230 u.s. 512 (1913) knott v. st. louis, kansas city & colorado railroad company no. 347, 348 argued april 1, 2, 3, 1912 decided june 16, 1913 230 u.s. 512 appeal and cross-appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the western district of missouri syllabus these suits having been consolidated with other similar suits disposed of by the decision in the missouri rate cases, ante, p. 230 u. s. 474 , the same disposition is made of these suits. the facts are stated in the opinion. memorandum opinion by direction of the court. by mr. justice hughes. this suit was one of the eighteen suits described in the missouri rate cases, ante, p. 230 u. s. 474 . upon the hearing below, as it appeared that the property of the st. louis, kansas city & colorado railroad company had been acquired by the chicago, rock island & pacific railway company, it was ordered by consent of the parties that the suits of the two companies should be consolidated, and that page 230 u. s. 513 the "findings, statements, and figures as to both companies" should be put "in consolidated form as those of the chicago, rock island & pacific railway company." separate decrees were entered in the two cases, and separate appeals and cross-appeals have been taken. the same disposition must be made of both. see knott v. chicago, rock island, and pacific railway company, sub missouri rate cases, note, p. 230 u. s. 474 , ante. the decree below is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directions to dismiss the bill without prejudice. it is so ordered.

Full Judgment

Knott v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado R. Co. - 230 U.S. 512 (1913)
U.S. Supreme Court Knott v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado R. Co., 230 U.S. 512 (1913)

Knott v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad Company

No. 347, 348

Argued April 1, 2, 3, 1912

Decided June 16, 1913

230 U.S. 512

APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

SYLLABUS

These suits having been consolidated with other similar suits disposed of by the decision in the Missouri Rate Cases, ante, p. 230 U. S. 474 , the same disposition is made of these suits.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Memorandum opinion by direction of the court. By MR. JUSTICE HUGHES.

This suit was one of the eighteen suits described in the Missouri Rate Cases, ante, p. 230 U. S. 474 . Upon the hearing below, as it appeared that the property of the St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad Company had been acquired by the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, it was ordered by consent of the parties that the suits of the two companies should be consolidated, and that

Page 230 U. S. 513

the "findings, statements, and figures as to both companies" should be put "in consolidated form as those of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company."

Separate decrees were entered in the two cases, and separate appeals and cross-appeals have been taken.

The same disposition must be made of both. See Knott v. Chicago, Rock Island, and Pacific Railway Company, sub Missouri Rate Cases, note, p. 230 U. S. 474 , ante. The decree below is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directions to dismiss the bill without prejudice.

It is so ordered.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial