Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sreeni. Vs. State of KeralA.

Sreeni. vs State of KeralA.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 06, 2010
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/912975

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl..No. 7864 of 2010
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[MR.J.S.KHEHAR, CHIEF .JUSTICE ; MR.JUSTICE A.S.BOPANNA, J.J.] This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the impugned order dated 2.3.2011 in IA No. 1479/2010 in AIR (SA) 882/2010 vide Annexure-U and allow the same in accordance with the law and direct t...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 439; Abkari Act - Sections 55(a), 55(i)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sreeni.

Advocate SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN, Adv.

Respondent

State of KeralA.

Legal References

Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 439; Abkari Act - Sections 55(a), 55(i)

Excerpt

[mr.j.s.khehar, chief .justice ; mr.justice a.s.bopanna, j.j.] this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to set aside the impugned order dated 2.3.2011 in ia no. 1479/2010 in air (sa) 882/2010 vide annexure-u and allow the same in accordance with the law and direct the drat, chennai to adjudicate the appeal in air (sa) 882/2010 on its merits., and etc.1. in this petition filed under section 439 cr.p.c. the petitioner who is the sole accused in crime no.743 of 2010 of kanjar police station for offences punishable under sections 55(a) & (i) of the abkari act for having been found in possession of 2.25 litres of indian made foreign liquor, seeks his enlargement on bail. the petitioner was arrested on 23/11/2010. 2. i heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor. 3. having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., i am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 17/12/2010 on his executing a bond for `35,000/- (rupees thirty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the judicial magistrate of the first class-i, thodupuzha and subject to the following conditions:- 1. the petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all wednesdays. 2. the petitioner shall make him available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report. 3. the petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. 4. the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. if the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. this application is allowed as above.

Full Judgment

1. In this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No.743 of 2010 of Kanjar Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 55(a) & (i) of the Abkari Act for having been found in possession of 2.25 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 23/11/2010.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 17/12/2010 on his executing a bond for `35,000/- (Rupees thirty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-I, Thodupuzha and subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. The petitioner shall make him available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial