Lal Singh, and Another. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.).

Lal Singh, and Another. vs State of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.).

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Aug 02, 2010

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/912283

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/912283
Court: Allahabad High Court
Judge: Ram Autar Singh,J.
Decided On: Aug 02, 2010
Case Number: CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9522 of 2010
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the order dated 25.02.2004 made in R.E.A.No.954 of 1995 in REP.No.1/93 by the Hon'ble Additional Sub-Judge, Salem, dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner herein seeking to implead themselves in the execution proceedings...

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 224, 332, 353, 307, 323, 308, 427, 225, 504, 506; Criminal Law Amendment Act - Section 7

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lal Singh, and Another.

Advocate Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, Adv.

Respondent

State of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.).

Legal References

Acts: indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 224, 332, 353, 307, 323, 308, 427, 225, 504, 506; Criminal Law Amendment Act - Section 7

Excerpt

prayer: civil revision petition filed under article 227 of constitution of india against the order dated 25.02.2004 made in r.e.a.no.954 of 1995 in rep.no.1/93 by the hon'ble additional sub-judge, salem, dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner herein seeking to implead themselves in the execution proceedings in rep no.1/93 and thereby permit them to contest the claim of the first respondent.1. heard shri rajendra prasad tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, learned a.g.a. for the state and perused the record. 2. the learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that co-accused tota ram has been granted bail by this court in criminal misc. bail application no. 15387 of 2010 on 18.6.2010. 3. the learned counsel for the applicants has further submitted that allegedly a mob attacked on the police party, no specific role causing the injury has been assigned to the applicants. moreover the applicants are having no criminal history and they are in jail since 11.3.2010. 4. in view of the above facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, applicants are entitled to be released on bail. 5. let the applicants lal singh and yogesh involved in case crime no.172 of 2010, under sections 147, 148, 149, 224, 332, 353, 307, 323, 308, 427, 225, 504, 506 i.p.c. and section 7 criminal law amendment act,, p.s. koshi kala, district mathura, be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (i) that the applicants shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (2) that they shall report to the court of c.j.m. concerned in the first week of each month to show their good conduct and behavior till conclusion of the trial. 6. in case of default of any of the above mentioned conditions, the bail granted to the applicants shall be deemed cancelled and they shall be taken into custody forthwith.

Full Judgment

1. Heard Shri Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the state and perused the record.

2. The learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that co-accused Tota Ram has been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15387 of 2010 on 18.6.2010.

3. The learned counsel for the applicants has further submitted that allegedly a mob attacked on the police party, no specific role causing the injury has been assigned to the applicants. Moreover the applicants are having no criminal history and they are in jail since 11.3.2010.

4. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

5. Let the applicants Lal Singh and Yogesh involved in Case Crime No.172 of 2010, under sections 147, 148, 149, 224, 332, 353, 307, 323, 308, 427, 225, 504, 506 I.P.C. and section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act,, P.S. Koshi Kala, District Mathura, be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (I) That the applicants shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (2) That they shall report to the court of C.J.M. concerned in the first week of each month to show their good conduct and behavior till conclusion of the trial.

6. In case of default of any of the above mentioned conditions, the bail granted to the applicants shall be deemed cancelled and they shall be taken into custody forthwith.

Same Court & Year Allahabad · 2010 Same Parties Lal Singh, and Another. vs State of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.). Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Ram Autar Singh,J. Acts & Sections indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 224, 332, 3...

Criminal