Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Wenar Vs. Jones

Wenar vs Jones

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1910
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90985

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
217 U.S. 593
Subject
Narcotics

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Narcotics

Key legal issue
Narcotics

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Wenar

Respondent

Jones

Excerpt

wenar v. jones - 217 u.s. 593 (1910) u.s. supreme court wenar v. jones, 217 u.s. 593 (1910) 217 u.s. 593 joseph wenar, appellant, v. william a. jones, bishop of porto rico. no. 143. supreme court of the united states april 25, 1910 mr. willis sweet for appellant. messrs. frederic r. coudert, paul fuller, and howard thayer kingsbury for appellee. per curiam: appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. harrington v. holler ( crawford v. haller) 111 u.s. 796 , 28 l. ed. 602, 4 sup. ct. rep. 697, and cases cited.

Full Judgment

WENAR v. JONES - 217 U.S. 593 (1910)
U.S. Supreme Court WENAR v. JONES, 217 U.S. 593 (1910)

217 U.S. 593

JOSEPH WENAR, Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM A. JONES, Bishop of Porto Rico.
No. 143.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 25, 1910

Mr. Willis Sweet for appellant.

Messrs. Frederic R. Coudert, Paul Fuller, and Howard Thayer Kingsbury for appellee.

Per Curiam:

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Harrington v. Holler ( Crawford v. Haller) 111 U.S. 796 , 28 L. ed. 602, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 697, and cases cited.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial