Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Trident India Ltd. Vs. Cham Ice and Cold Storage and ors.

Trident India Ltd. vs Cham Ice and Cold Storage and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Jan 12, 2011
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/908890

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 497 OF 2011 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C)NO.10795 OF 2008)
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[DALVEER BHANDARI; DEEPAK VERMA, JJ.]The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 15.02.2008 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad passed in First Appeal No.5300 of 2007 by which the money decree was stayed by the High Court. We request the High Court not to grant unnecessary adjournments.

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Trident India Ltd.

Respondent

Cham Ice and Cold Storage and ors.

Excerpt

[dalveer bhandari; deepak verma, jj.]the appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 15.02.2008 of the division bench of the high court of gujarat at ahmedabad passed in first appeal no.5300 of 2007 by which the money decree was stayed by the high court. we request the high court not to grant unnecessary adjournments.1. leave granted.2. the appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 15.02.2008 of the division bench of the high court of gujarat at ahmedabad passed in first appeal no.5300 of 2007 by which the money decree was stayed by the high court.3. we have heard learned counsel for the parties. the judgment debtor has already deposited a sum of rs.2 crores with the high court on 11.07.2005. the amount has been released to the appellant on furnishing the bank guarantee. in the facts of this case, instead of the bank guarantee, we direct the appellant to furnish solvent security to the satisfaction of the registrar general of the high court of gujarat at ahmedabad. in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we request the high court to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within three months from the date of communication of this order. we direct the parties to co-operate with the court. we request the high court not to grant unnecessary adjournments.4. this appeal is, accordingly, disposed of, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

Full Judgment

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 15.02.2008 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad passed in First Appeal No.5300 of 2007 by which the money decree was stayed by the High Court.

3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The judgment debtor has already deposited a sum of Rs.2 crores with the High Court on 11.07.2005. The amount has been released to the appellant on furnishing the bank guarantee. In the facts of this case, instead of the bank guarantee, we direct the appellant to furnish solvent security to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we request the High Court to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within three months from the date of communication of this order. We direct the parties to co-operate with the Court. We request the High Court not to grant unnecessary adjournments.

4. This appeal is, accordingly, disposed of, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial