T Sureshbabu Vs. the Deputy General Manager State Bank of Mysore Central Zone

T Sureshbabu vs The Deputy General Manager State Bank of Mysore Central Zone

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Nov 02, 2010

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/908730

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/908730
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: Ram Mohan Reddy J.
Decided On: Nov 02, 2010
Case Number: WRIT PETITION NO.35143 OF 2009 (S-RES)
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[RAM MOHAN REDDY J.] This petition filed under articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the endorsement issued by the respondent 21.1.2006 vide Anx-K., direct the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment by considering the application in support of his...

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T Sureshbabu

Advocate Sri. M S CHANDRASHEKAR BABU, ADV

Respondent

The Deputy General Manager State Bank of Mysore Central Zone

Advocate Sri. S V NARASIMHAN, ADV

Excerpt

[ram mohan reddy j.] this petition filed under articles 226 & 227 of the constitution of india praying to quash the endorsement issued by the respondent 21.1.2006 vide anx-k., direct the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment by considering the application in support of his claim to the suitable post in the respondent department.order1. the communication dated 21.01.2006 annexure-"k" of the respondent - state bank of mysore rejecting the petitioners application for appointment on compassionate basis is called in question in this petition.2. the communication rejecting the petitioner's application reads thus:"2. on examination of the details of assets and liabilities, family pension, etc., furnished by you, we are of the view that the family is not in a destitute condition. we therefore, regret our inability to consider your request for appointment in the bank on compassionate grounds."3. suffice it to state that the rejection is based on an order which is bereft of details and reasons, much less findings, except conclusions. it is elsewhere said that if an order does not furnish reasons and findings and mere conclusions, tantamount to denial of justice. in that view of the matter, the petition deserves to be allowed. in the result, the petition is allowed. the communication impugned annexure-"k" is quashed and the respondent - state bank of mysore is directed to consider the petitioner's application in the proper perspective and to pass orders, strictly in accordance with law. compliance within two months.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. The communication dated 21.01.2006 Annexure-"K" of the respondent - State Bank of Mysore rejecting the petitioners application for appointment on compassionate basis is called in question in this petition.

2. The communication rejecting the petitioner's application reads thus:

"2. On examination of the details of assets and liabilities, family pension, etc., furnished by you, we are of the view that the family is not in a destitute condition. We therefore, regret our inability to consider your request for appointment in the Bank on Compassionate Grounds."

3. Suffice it to state that the rejection is based on an order which is bereft of details and reasons, much less findings, except conclusions. It is elsewhere said that if an order does not furnish reasons and findings and mere conclusions, tantamount to denial of justice. In that view of the matter, the petition deserves to be allowed. in the result, the petition is allowed. The communication impugned Annexure-"K" is quashed and the respondent - State Bank of Mysore is directed to consider the petitioner's application in the proper perspective and to pass orders, strictly in accordance with law. Compliance within two months.

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2010 Same Parties T Sureshbabu vs The Deputy General Manager State Bank of Myso... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Ram Mohan Reddy J.

Land Acquisition