Brantley Vs. Georgia

Brantley vs Georgia

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-11-1910

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90872

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/90872
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Apr-11-1910
Case Number: 217 U.S. 284
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Brantley

Respondent

Georgia

Excerpt

.....one shall be put in second jeopardy for the same offense save on his own motion for new trial or in case of mistrial, there is no question involved of twice in jeopardy under the constitution of the united states. 132 ga. 573 affirmed. the facts are stated in the opinion. per curiam: brantley was indicted in the superior court of washington county, georgia, charged with the offense of murder; was tried and found guilty of voluntary manslaughter; filed a motion for new trial, and, upon appeal to the state court of appeals, obtained a reversal of the judgment, and a new trial was ordered. at the second trial, he filed a plea of former jeopardy, claiming that he had been tried for murder, and having been found guilty of a lesser grade of homicide, that operated to acquit him of the charge of murder, and to try him again for murder under the same indictment would be to try him again for an page 217 u. s. 285 offense of which he had been previously acquitted, and that he could only be arraigned for voluntary manslaughter. this plea was demurred to and the demurrer sustained by the court. the case then proceeded to trial, and the jury found him guilty of murder, whereupon he was sentenced to life imprisonment. he moved for new trial, which motion was overruled, and thereupon he appealed to the supreme court of the state of georgia, which affirmed the judgment of the lower court. 132 ga. 573. the constitution of the state of georgia provides that "no person shall be put in jeopardy of life or liberty more than once for the same offense, save on his or her own motion for a new trial, after conviction, or in case of mistrial." this writ of error was sued out, and plaintiff in error contended that the judgment of the supreme court of georgia was in violation of the fifth amendment of the constitution of the united states, and that the provision of the constitution of the state of georgia was null and void as construed by the state supreme.....

Full Judgment

Brantley v. Georgia - 217 U.S. 284 (1910)
U.S. Supreme Court Brantley v. Georgia, 217 U.S. 284 (1910)

Brantley v. Georgia

No. 692

Argued April 6, 1910

Decided April 11, 1910

217 U.S. 284

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA

SYLLABUS

Where one has been tried in a state court for murder and convicted of manslaughter, and, on his own motion, obtains a reversal and new trial, on which he is convicted of a higher offense, and the constitution of the state provides that no one shall be put in second jeopardy for the same offense save on his own motion for new trial or in case of mistrial, there is no question involved of twice in jeopardy under the Constitution of the United States.

132 Ga. 573 affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Brantley was indicted in the Superior Court of Washington County, Georgia, charged with the offense of murder; was tried and found guilty of voluntary manslaughter; filed a motion for new trial, and, upon appeal to the state court of appeals, obtained a reversal of the judgment, and a new trial was ordered.

At the second trial, he filed a plea of former jeopardy, claiming that he had been tried for murder, and having been found guilty of a lesser grade of homicide, that operated to acquit him of the charge of murder, and to try him again for murder under the same indictment would be to try him again for an

Page 217 U. S. 285

offense of which he had been previously acquitted, and that he could only be arraigned for voluntary manslaughter. This plea was demurred to and the demurrer sustained by the court. The case then proceeded to trial, and the jury found him guilty of murder, whereupon he was sentenced to life imprisonment. He moved for new trial, which motion was overruled, and thereupon he appealed to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, which affirmed the judgment of the lower court. 132 Ga. 573.

The Constitution of the State of Georgia provides that "no person shall be put in jeopardy of life or liberty more than once for the same offense, save on his or her own motion for a new trial, after conviction, or in case of mistrial." This writ of error was sued out, and plaintiff in error contended that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia was in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and that the provision of the Constitution of the State of Georgia was null and void as construed by the state supreme court.

The contention is absolutely without merit. It was not a case of twice in jeopardy under any view of the Constitution of the United States.

Judgment affirmed.

Same Parties Brantley vs Georgia Same Subject Criminal