Noushad Vs. State of Kerala

.....of immigrants there is perhaps not a single instance of an invasion from india to outside india. is there any evidence to show whence they came into india? is brahui a surviving trace of the immigration of dravidian - speaking peoples into india from the west? or does it mark the limits of an overflow form india into baluchistan? the original inhabitants of india may be identified with the speakers of the munda languages, which are unrelated to either indo-aryan or dravidian languages" 28. it is for this reason that there is such tremendous diversity in india. there are a large number of religions, castes, languages, ethnic groups, cultures etc. in our country, which is due to the fact that india is a country of immigrants. we may compare india with china which is larger both in population and in land area than india. on the other hand, as stated above, india has tremendous diversity and this is due to the large scale migrations and invasions into india over thousands of years. the various immigrants/invaders who came into india brought with them their different cultures, languages, religions, etc. which accounts for the tremendous diversity in india. however, giving formal equality to all groups or communities in india would not result in genuine equality. the injustice done to the tribal people of india is a shameful chapter in our country's history. despite this horrible oppression on them, the tribals of india have generally (though not invariably) retained a higher level of ethics than the non-tribals in our country. v.ramkumar, j.bail application no.7037 of 2010dated this the 9th day of november, 2010order1. the petitioner, who is accused no.2 in crime no.1008 of 2010 of sakthikulangara police station for offences punishable under sections 120(b), 417 & 420 read with section 34 i.p.c., seeks anticipatory bail. 2. the learned public prosecutor opposed the application.3. anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. but at the same time, i am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the investigating officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail considered by the magistrate having jurisdiction. accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on 22/11/2010 or on 23/11/2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. the petitioner shall thereafter be produced before the magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioner has been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of his application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed. 4. this petition is disposed of as above.