Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manoj @ Keeper Manoj Vs. State of Kerala

Manoj @ Keeper Manoj vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 04, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/907949

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.M.C.No. 4422 OF 2010
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[H.BILLAPPA J.] This R.S.A. is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.03.2006 passed in RA.No.21/1996 on the file of the District & Sessions Judge. Kodagu, Madikeri, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.06.1996. Passed in O.S.No.87/19990 on the file o...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 482; Indian Penal Code,(IPC) - Section 379

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj @ Keeper Manoj

Advocate SRI.V.M.KURIAN, Adv.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Legal References

Acts
Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 482; Indian Penal Code,(IPC) - Section 379

Excerpt

[h.billappa j.] this r.s.a. is filed under section 100 of cpc against the judgment and decree dated 22.03.2006 passed in ra.no.21/1996 on the file of the district & sessions judge. kodagu, madikeri, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.06.1996. passed in o.s.no.87/19990 on the file of the civil judge, kodagu. madikeri.o r d e rm.sasidharan nambiar,j. =========================== crl.m.c.no. 4422 of 2010 =========================== dated this the 4th day of november,2010 order petitioner is the accused in c.c.725/2005 on the file of judicial first class magistrate court, thiroor. this petition is filed under section 482 of code of criminal procedure for a direction to the magistrate to consider the application for bail on the date of his surrender contending that cognizance was taken for the offence under section 379 of indian penal code and he was granted bail at the investigation stage and thereafter no summons was received from the court and the non bailable warrant was issued. 2. when a non bailable warrant is pending and the accused surrenders and files an application for bail, magistrate is expected to pass orders in the application without delay. i find no reason to believe that if summons was not served on the petitioner and a non bailable warrant was issued, learned magistrate will not withdraw the non bailable warrant or will not grant bail to the petitioner. in such circumstances, no direction is warranted. petition is disposed.

Full Judgment

O R D E R

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.

===========================

CRL.M.C.No. 4422 OF 2010

===========================

Dated this the 4th day of November,2010

ORDER

Petitioner is the accused in C.C.725/2005 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thiroor. This petition is filed under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for a direction to the Magistrate to consider the application for bail on the date of his surrender contending that cognizance was taken for the offence under section 379 of Indian Penal code and he was granted bail at the investigation stage and thereafter no summons was received from the court and the non bailable warrant was issued.

2. When a non bailable warrant is pending and the accused surrenders and files an application for bail, Magistrate is expected to pass orders in the application without delay. I find no reason to believe that if summons was not served on the petitioner and a non bailable warrant was issued, learned Magistrate will not withdraw the non bailable warrant or will not grant bail to the petitioner. In such circumstances, no direction is warranted.

Petition is disposed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial