Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt.Fareeda, and ors. Vs. the State by Cubbon Park Police Station.

Smt.Fareeda, and ors. vs The State by Cubbon Park Police Station.

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Dec 23, 2010
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/907900

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5343 OF 2010
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[ANAND BYRAREDDY J.]This CRL.P. Filed under Section 438 CR.P.C. Praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in cr.no.301/2009 of cubbon park p.s., which is registered for the offences punishable under sections 406, 418, 420, 465, 466, 468 and 177 of IPC.

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406, 418, 420, 465, 466, 468, 177; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC), 1973 - Section 438

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt.Fareeda, and ors.

Advocate L. Sudharshan, Adv.

Respondent

The State by Cubbon Park Police Station.

Advocate Sri Vijayakumar Majage, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406, 418, 420, 465, 466, 468, 177; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC), 1973 - Section 438

Excerpt

[anand byrareddy j.]this crl.p. filed under section 438 cr.p.c. praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in cr.no.301/2009 of cubbon park p.s., which is registered for the offences punishable under sections 406, 418, 420, 465, 466, 468 and 177 of ipc......with certain third parties, it is this, which is the basis of the complaint alleging offence punishable under the sections as stated above.4. the court below has rejected the application for anticipatory bail on the reasoning that, the alleged, offences leveled against the petitioners requires custodial interrogation and because the documents are yet to be produced before the investigating officer and therefore, petitioners are not entitled for grant of anticipatory bail. however, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, if anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners on certain conditions imposed, ends of justice would be met5. accordingly the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail subject to the following conditions;1) if the petitioners are arrested in crime no.301/2010 of cubbon park police station, registered for the offences punishable under sections 406, 418, 420, 465, 466, 46s and 177 of indian penal code, they shall be released on bail.2) this is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall furnish personal bonds for a sum of rs 25,000/- each, with two solvent sureties for likeaums to the satisfaction of the trial court. 3) the petitioners shall not intimidate or tamper with the prosecution witnesses4) the petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation by the investigating officer as and when required. 8) the petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial court without leave of the court. the petitioners shall approach the court below for regular bail within a period of eight weeks from today. on such application being made, the court below shall consider the application without being influenced by any of the observations made herein.

Full Judgment

1. Heard the counsel for the petitioners.

2. Complaint was registered against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 418, 420, 465, 466, 468 and 177 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime Ho.301/2010 on the file of the Cubbon Park Police Station.

3. It is alleged that the Assistant General manager of the Vijaya Bonk had lodged a report that, the petitioners had approached the complainant on 23.01.2006 and had availed of a Housing Loan of Rs 16,60,000/- from the complainant in order to purchase certain property. It is further alleged that, the property was purchased in the name of petitioner No.1 and the said property was mortgaged with the complainant by executing a memorandum of deposit of original Title Deeds. However, it is further alleged that the petitioners became defaulters in re-payment of the amount. Inspite of sufficient time having teen granted, the petitioners delimited in repayment, It was alleged that the petitioners had thereafter manipulated and created yet, another set of Title Deeds, in respect of the very property which was mortgaged in favour of the complainant, and had entered into an agreement for development of the said property with certain third parties, It is this, which is the basis of the complaint alleging offence punishable under the Sections as stated above.

4. The court below has rejected the application for anticipatory bail on the reasoning that, the alleged, offences leveled against the petitioners requires custodial interrogation and because the documents are yet to be produced before the investigating officer and therefore, petitioners are not entitled for grant of anticipatory bail. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, if anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners on certain conditions imposed, ends of justice would be met

5. Accordingly the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail subject to the following conditions;

1) If the petitioners are arrested in Crime No.301/2010 of Cubbon Park Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 418, 420, 465, 466, 46S and 177 of Indian Penal Code, they shall be released on bail.

2) This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall furnish personal bonds for a sum of Rs 25,000/- each, with two solvent sureties for likeaums to the satisfaction of the trial court.

3) The petitioners shall not intimidate or tamper with the prosecution witnesses

4) The petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation by the Investigating Officer as and when required.

8) The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial court without leave of the court. The petitioners shall approach the court below for regular bail within a period of eight weeks from today. On such application being made, the court below shall consider the application without being influenced by any of the observations made herein.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial