Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Griffith Vs. Connecticut

Griffith vs Connecticut

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-12-1910
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90788

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
218 U.S. 572
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Griffith

Respondent

Connecticut

Excerpt

griffith v. connecticut - 218 u.s. 572 (1910) u.s. supreme court griffith v. connecticut, 218 u.s. 572 (1910) griffith v. connecticut no. 515 motion to dismiss or affirm submitted november 28, 1910 decided december 12, 1910 218 u.s. 572 error to the supreme court of errors of the state of connecticut syllabus decided on authority of griffith v. connecticut, ante, p. 218 u. s. 563 . the facts are stated in the opinion. mr. justice white delivered the opinion of the court. the parties to this record are the same as in no. 514, just decided, ante, p. 218 u. s. 563 , and the questions involved are the same, the prosecution being for similar offenses against the connecticut act of 1907. both cases were tried together. upon the conviction in this, however, the trial court imposed the penalty of imprisonment. the two cases were disposed of by the supreme court of errors in one opinion. as the decision in no. 514 is necessarily controlling, it follows that the judgment of the supreme court of errors of connecticut must be, and it is, affirmed.

Full Judgment

Griffith v. Connecticut - 218 U.S. 572 (1910)
U.S. Supreme Court Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U.S. 572 (1910)

Griffith v. Connecticut

No. 515

Motion to dismiss or affirm

Submitted November 28, 1910

Decided December 12, 1910

218 U.S. 572

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS

OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

SYLLABUS

Decided on authority of Griffith v. Connecticut, ante, p. 218 U. S. 563 .

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE White delivered the opinion of the Court.

The parties to this record are the same as in No. 514, just decided, ante, p. 218 U. S. 563 , and the questions involved are the same, the prosecution being for similar offenses against the Connecticut Act of 1907. Both cases were tried together. Upon the conviction in this, however, the trial court imposed the penalty of imprisonment. The two cases were disposed of by the Supreme Court of Errors in one opinion. As the decision in No. 514 is necessarily controlling, it follows that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut must be, and it is,

Affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial