Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Thomas Vs. South Side Elevated R Co

Thomas vs South Side Elevated R Co

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1909
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90766

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
214 U.S. 496
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thomas

Respondent

South Side Elevated R Co

Excerpt

thomas v. south side elevated r co - 214 u.s. 496 (1909) u.s. supreme court thomas v. south side elevated r co, 214 u.s. 496 (1909) 214 u.s. 496 george w. thomas, plaintiff in error, v. south side elevated railway company. no. 157. april 26, 1909 mr. george w. thomas, in propria persona. messrs. monroe l. willard and cecil page for defendant in error. page 214 u.s. 496, 497 per curiam: writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. stevens v. nichols, 157 u.s. 370 , 39 l. ed. 736, 15 sup. ct. rep. 640; loeber v. schroeder, 149 u.s. 580 , 37 l. ed. 856, 13 sup. ct. rep. 934; central land co. v. laidley, 159 u.s. 103 , 40 l. ed. 91, 16 sup. ct. rep. 80; a. backus, jr ., & sons v. fort street union depot co. 169 u.s. 557 , 42 l. ed. 853, 18 sup. ct. rep. 445; ballard v. hunter, 204 u.s. 241 , 51 l. ed. 461, 27 sup. ct. rep. 261; tracy v. ginzberg, 205 u.s. 170 , 51 l. ed. 755, 27 sup. ct. rep. 461; rusch v. john duncan land & min. co. 211 u.s. 526 , 53 l. ed. --, 29 sup. ct. rep. 172.

Full Judgment

THOMAS v. SOUTH SIDE ELEVATED R CO - 214 U.S. 496 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court THOMAS v. SOUTH SIDE ELEVATED R CO, 214 U.S. 496 (1909)

214 U.S. 496

GEORGE W. THOMAS, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
SOUTH SIDE ELEVATED RAILWAY COMPANY.
No. 157.

April 26, 1909

Mr. George W. Thomas, in propria persona.

Messrs. Monroe L. Willard and Cecil Page for defendant in error.

Page 214 U.S. 496, 497

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Stevens v. Nichols, 157 U.S. 370 , 39 L. ed. 736, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 640; Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U.S. 580 , 37 L. ed. 856, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 934; Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U.S. 103 , 40 L. ed. 91, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 80; A. Backus, Jr ., & Sons v. Fort Street Union Depot Co. 169 U.S. 557 , 42 L. ed. 853, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 445; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U.S. 241 , 51 L. ed. 461, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 261; Tracy v. Ginzberg, 205 U.S. 170 , 51 L. ed. 755, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 461; Rusch v. John Duncan Land & Min. Co. 211 U.S. 526 , 53 L. ed. --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 172.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial