Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sass and Crawford Vs. Thomas

Sass and Crawford vs Thomas

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1909
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90764

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
214 U.S. 489
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sass and Crawford

Respondent

Thomas

Excerpt

sass & crawford v. thomas - 214 u.s. 489 (1909) u.s. supreme court sass & crawford v. thomas, 214 u.s. 489 (1909) 214 u.s. 489 sass & crawford, plaintiffs in error, v. minnie thomas and charley thomas. no. 112. march 22, 1909. page 214 u.s. 489, 490 messrs. w. a. ledbetter and s. t. bledsoe for plaintiffs in error. messrs. a. c. cruce and w. i. cruce for defendants in error. per curiam: the writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, on authority of laurel oil & gas co. v. morrison, 212 u.s. 291 , 53 l. ed . --, 29 sup. ct. rep. 394, decided on february 23, last.

Full Judgment

SASS & CRAWFORD v. THOMAS - 214 U.S. 489 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court SASS & CRAWFORD v. THOMAS, 214 U.S. 489 (1909)

214 U.S. 489

SASS & CRAWFORD, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MINNIE THOMAS and Charley Thomas.
No. 112.

March 22, 1909.

Page 214 U.S. 489, 490

Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter and S. T. Bledsoe for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. A. C. Cruce and W. I. Cruce for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: The Writ of Error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, on authority of Laurel Oil & Gas Co. v. Morrison, 212 U.S. 291 , 53 L. ed . --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 394, decided on February 23, last.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial